Skip to content

Question - Do we support submitting the SSL certificate when estabilishing the service to comply with requireClientCert? #604

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
guilhemmarchand opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@guilhemmarchand
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When creating the service, do we support submitting the SSL certificate so we can satisfy with requireClientCert?

When enabled, the third party connecting to splunkd must present a valid certificate:

requireClientCert =

  • Whether or not an HTTPS client which connects to a splunkd
    server must possess a certificate that a certificate authority
    signed to complete the connection.
  • Multiple services can use this setting, including but not
    limited to distributed search and distributed deployment clients.
    • Splunk platform indexers must use this setting to connect to
      other Splunk platform indexers.
    • Deployment clients must present certificates to deployment
      servers before they can poll the servers for new configurations
      or applications.
  • A value of "true" means that a client can connect only if it
    has a certificate that was signed by a certificate
    authority that the splunkd server trusts.
  • A value of "false" means that there is no certificate requirement
    to connect to services on another Splunk platform instance.
  • Default: false

I have found the following issue from some years ago:

#123

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Do we support it now?
  • If we do not, could this be implemented in the near future?

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant