I don't think the message is the problem with this rule; the rule implementation itself is far too broad with what it detects. For example, consider one of the examples mentioned in that PR:

remove the suffix 'Data' from the name of the variable 'postgresDataType'

Presuming Data was the type of that property, that's an absolutely fine property name that doesn't violate this rule.

I don't remember precisely why we used contains in this implementation, unless it was a lackluster attempt at also catching plural terms. But at a minimum, I think we should be doing a suffix check instead of a contains check.

If you're really interested in exploring this, we could gain more insight by looking at how the compiler itself (in ClangImporter) stems type-name suffixes off the names of imported Objective-C names, and reimplement similar logic here to detect those cases.

Oh, I see. Thank you for your kind advice.
I’ll refer to the ClangImporter logic and reimplement it accordingly!