Skip to content

Legal References Not Consistent #14

@KampfCaspar

Description

@KampfCaspar

Within one document (README), the act is referenced both as 'EMBAG' as well as 'EMOTA'. Furthermore, references within the act are written both as prefix (Article 9 EMOTA - capital A!) as well as postfix (EMBAG Art. 9).

I would suggest using one single, consistent reference style for all documents. What style the Federal Chancellery prescribes for english texts, I don't know.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions