You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The one-sided payment example in RFC-0204 is out of date. It references the use of RFC-0180 Bulletproof range proof rewinding. In addition to Bulletproofs being superseded by Bulletproofs+ for range proving and mask recovery, value communication is now done using a separate encryption.
This should be changed to reflect the work-in-progress PR for Bulletproofs+ range proving.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is about to become even more out of date than before.
A draft PR suggests making range proofs optional, and encrypting commitment values and masks together. Once it is merged, any references to range proof rewinding in RFC-0204 will be inaccurate. While rewinding will still be possible in the Bulletproofs+ library, the default client will no longer support it.
Another draft PR suggests a change to interactive outputs to better support scanning without access to a wallet's secret key. Once it is implemented, the discussion of such outputs in RFC-0204 will be inaccurate.
The one-sided payment example in RFC-0204 is out of date. It references the use of RFC-0180 Bulletproof range proof rewinding. In addition to Bulletproofs being superseded by Bulletproofs+ for range proving and mask recovery, value communication is now done using a separate encryption.
This should be changed to reflect the work-in-progress PR for Bulletproofs+ range proving.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: