Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for RANGE op #3040

Open
fwcd opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for RANGE op #3040

fwcd opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@fwcd
Copy link
Contributor

fwcd commented Jan 21, 2025

This op seems to be used internally by MelSpectrogram layers and would be convenient to have supported.

Potentially related:

@HemanthSai7
Copy link

The op needs to be ported 😢

Copy link
Contributor

"This issue is being marked as stale due to inactivity. Remove label or comment to prevent closure in 5 days."

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Feb 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

"This issue is being closed because it has been marked as
stale for 5 days with no further activity."

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 24, 2025
@ddavis-2015 ddavis-2015 removed the Stale label Mar 4, 2025
@ddavis-2015 ddavis-2015 reopened this Mar 4, 2025
@ddavis-2015
Copy link
Member

@fwcd @HemanthSai7 Let's discuss further. TFLM does not have dynamic memory allocation, thus a RANGE operator would be limited to only being supportable with all 3 inputs as constant-tensors. Is this the way it is used in existing models?

@HemanthSai7
Copy link

HemanthSai7 commented Mar 5, 2025

Yeah. I had to remove the usage of range while converting the model to TFLITE. Yes I was using it with dynamic arrays.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants