(question) Rule query syntax validation

[niccolocast]

Your question

Is query syntax validation without evaluation possible?
For example calling a function that returns an error if a user tries to add a malformed rule query like ((env eq "pro") and (company eq "go-feature-flag")

[thomaspoignant]

Hi @niccolocast, I have looked at your question and checked in the nikunjy/rules what was possible to do to validate a rule.

I came to this simple solution that works partially:

func eval(rule string) error {
	ev, err := parser.NewEvaluator(rule)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	_, err = ev.Process(map[string]interface{}{})
	return err
}

If the eval function error it means that the rule is invalid.
That being said it does not catch all the use-cases, your example is considered valid while it should not.

To have a bit more info, I have opened this issue nikunjy/rules#41 on the nikunjy/rules repository. If I know more about it I will let you know.

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

[github-actions]

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.