-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for uv.sources #151
Comments
PR welcome... but I don't plan adding this myself. |
I am interested in this feature and am happy to contribute but I think I could use some architectural debate/guidance. To me it appears that root cause here is that
in separate stages, as opposed to doing a singular Coalescing into a single install stage/command would probably be very involved brain-surgery and probably break the Ideally I'd be able to force-feed a cc @charliermarsh in case there is a more elegant way of going about this |
IMHO this is the path ahead. |
Assuming you meant the former, this is interesting and I didn't expect that to be your preference! It does make things easier, but means that there will be lots of no-op stages i.e. TBH this isn't unique to |
What's the problem this feature will solve?
Resolve dependencies from non pypi sources like GitHub repos.
Describe the solution you'd like
Use uv's project dependency resolution. If a dependency has been declared in [tool.uv.project] resolve from that source instead of pypi (name colition)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: