You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How do you plan to make approximate matching work? User provides a function that takes two nodes and returns a "distance" factor?
I have a use case in mind for a tree of content nodes that have a special content_id attribute on them which I can use for exact matching, e.g. if nodeA.content_id == nodeB.content_id the match is 100% (or distance 0).
I posted some links about that here and looking forward to trying graphtage on the tree fixtures I have.
Graphtage already has an internal notion of edit distance, which is what it uses to output its progress bar when run from a TTY. The idea would be to:
allow the user to specify a maximum edit distance (defaulting to zero), and produce a result that is at most that distance from optimal; and/or
immediately print out the best solution found thus far when Graphtage receives a SIGTERM.
It sounds like you might be trying to do something slightly different, though. You might actually be able to do what you want using Graphtage's not-yet-very-well-documented --match-if argument. If you can provide a more detailed example of input files, I could try and give you an example of its usage.
Allow the user to specify a given epsilon of matching cost, and find a matching that is at most that epsilon from the cost of the optimal matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: