We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The expected behaviour, would be, as Sphinx, to just print the field name in bold. Maybe apply .title().
.title()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In general I prefer tools to complain loudly when non-existing syntax is used, as that helps discover errors early.
There is the newfield mechanism that can be used to define new fields that pydoctor doesn't know out-of-the-box. It's used in epydoc like this:
newfield
:newfield contributor: Contributor, Contributors (Alphabetical Order) :contributor: `Glyph Lefkowitz <mailto:[email protected]>`__ :contributor: `Edward Loper <mailto:[email protected]>`__
Sorry, something went wrong.
Replaced by #456
No branches or pull requests
The expected behaviour, would be, as Sphinx, to just print the field name in bold.
Maybe apply
.title()
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: