Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 37 commits
Commits
Show all changes
39 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
158e737
Suppresses RLC non-final field overwrite warning for safe constructor…
iamsanjaymalakar Apr 18, 2025
325e983
Add `@FindDistinct` annotation
mernst Apr 18, 2025
4cb90d7
Resolves PR review comments.
iamsanjaymalakar Apr 22, 2025
9d4d403
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Jun 13, 2025
c524542
Addresses PR comments.
iamsanjaymalakar Jun 13, 2025
a9a1e84
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Jul 10, 2025
dbd6447
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Jul 14, 2025
29071ca
Merge branch '7049-dev' of github.com:iamsanjaymalakar/checker-framew…
mernst Jul 14, 2025
14aebc4
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Jul 14, 2025
87b838c
Punctuation
mernst Jul 14, 2025
8ad095b
Improve comments
mernst Jul 14, 2025
fa2aef4
Tweak coment and code
mernst Jul 14, 2025
96c47f8
Better comments.
iamsanjaymalakar Jul 15, 2025
9a70147
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Jul 20, 2025
4010022
Add test showing error message at wrong location
mernst Jul 20, 2025
4765ecf
Comments and variable name
mernst Jul 20, 2025
143f3f4
Enhance test
mernst Jul 20, 2025
b11cd19
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Jul 21, 2025
dda12eb
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Aug 30, 2025
d78354e
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 4, 2025
81c8cab
Resolves PR comments. Mike's new test is passing now.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 7, 2025
f3b9022
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Oct 9, 2025
0d53a06
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Oct 10, 2025
07617a7
Improve documentation and naming
mernst Oct 10, 2025
c188d0f
Naming
mernst Oct 10, 2025
7f4360a
Add tests
mernst Oct 10, 2025
7eb84c4
Addresses Mike's review comments. Adds test.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 11, 2025
827e573
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 11, 2025
80d52c2
Replaces == with equals.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 11, 2025
a5d1f60
Method call in instance initializer block.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 11, 2025
786d477
Update checker/tests/resourceleak-firstinitconstructor/InstanceInitia…
mernst Oct 12, 2025
5d9d51a
Merge ../checker-framework-branch-master into 7049-dev
mernst Oct 12, 2025
46687a1
Expand tests
mernst Oct 12, 2025
679cbdf
Merge branch '7049-dev' of github.com:iamsanjaymalakar/checker-framew…
mernst Oct 12, 2025
000a833
Fix spelling
mernst Oct 12, 2025
2d9e299
More tests
mernst Oct 12, 2025
d55afd1
Side effecting constructor calls that may rewrite field. Updates tests.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 17, 2025
93210dd
Reverts == with .equals due to interning:not.interned error.
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 17, 2025
04d72ba
Merge branch 'master' into 7049-dev
iamsanjaymalakar Oct 17, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,12 +4,19 @@
import com.google.common.collect.FluentIterable;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import com.sun.source.tree.AssignmentTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.BlockTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.ClassTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.ExpressionStatementTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.ExpressionTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.MethodInvocationTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.MethodTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.NewClassTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.StatementTree;
import com.sun.source.tree.Tree;
import com.sun.source.tree.VariableTree;
import com.sun.source.util.TreePath;
import com.sun.source.util.TreeScanner;
import java.util.ArrayDeque;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
Expand All @@ -27,16 +34,19 @@
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.StringJoiner;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import javax.lang.model.SourceVersion;
import javax.lang.model.element.AnnotationMirror;
import javax.lang.model.element.Element;
import javax.lang.model.element.ElementKind;
import javax.lang.model.element.ExecutableElement;
import javax.lang.model.element.Modifier;
import javax.lang.model.element.TypeElement;
import javax.lang.model.element.VariableElement;
import javax.lang.model.type.TypeKind;
import javax.lang.model.type.TypeMirror;
import org.checkerframework.checker.calledmethods.qual.CalledMethods;
import org.checkerframework.checker.interning.qual.FindDistinct;
import org.checkerframework.checker.mustcall.CreatesMustCallForToJavaExpression;
import org.checkerframework.checker.mustcall.MustCallAnnotatedTypeFactory;
import org.checkerframework.checker.mustcall.MustCallChecker;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1511,6 +1521,23 @@ private void checkReassignmentToOwningField(Set<Obligation> obligations, Assignm
return;
}
}
} else if (TreeUtils.isConstructor(enclosingMethodTree)) {
// If this assignment the first write to the private field in this constructor,
// then do not throw non-final owning field reassignment error.
Element enclosingClassElement =
TreeUtils.elementFromDeclaration(enclosingMethodTree).getEnclosingElement();
if (ElementUtils.isTypeElement(enclosingClassElement)) {
Element receiverElement = TypesUtils.getTypeElement(receiver.getType());
if (Objects.equals(enclosingClassElement, receiverElement)) {
VariableElement lhsElement = lhs.getElement();
if (lhsElement.getModifiers().contains(Modifier.PRIVATE)
&& isFirstWriteToFieldInConstructor(
node.getTree(), lhsElement, enclosingMethodTree)) {
// Safe; first assignment in constructor.
return;
}
}
}
}

// Check that there is a corresponding CreatesMustCallFor annotation, unless this is
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1630,6 +1657,132 @@ && varTrackedInObligations(obligations, (LocalVariableNode) receiver))
}
}

/**
* Returns true if the given assignment is the first write to a field on its path in the
* constructor. This method is conservative: it returns {@code false} unless it can prove that the
* write is the first. This check runs only for non-final fields because the Java compiler already
* forbids reassignment of final fields.
*
* <p>The result is {@code true} only if all the following hold:
*
* <ul>
* <li>(1) The field has no non-null inline initializer at its declaration.
* <li>(2) The field is not assigned in any instance initializer block.
* <li>(3) The constructor does not delegate via {@code this(...)}.
* <li>(4) No earlier assignment to the same field appears before the current statement.
* <li>(5) No earlier method call appears before the current statement (except {@code
* super(...)}).
* </ul>
*
* @param assignment the actual assignment tree being analyzed, which is a statement in
* @param field the field being assigned
* @param constructor the constructor where the assignment appears {@code constructor}
* @return true if this assignment is the first write during construction
*/
Comment on lines +1660 to +1681
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix Javadoc params (incomplete/typo).

Tighten the param docs to avoid confusion.

- * @param assignment the actual assignment tree being analyzed, which is a statement in
+ * @param assignment the actual assignment tree being analyzed, which is a statement in the
+ *     body of {@code constructor}
  * @param field the field being assigned
- * @param constructor the constructor where the assignment appears {@code constructor}
+ * @param constructor the constructor where the assignment appears

private boolean isFirstWriteToFieldInConstructor(
@FindDistinct Tree assignment, VariableElement field, MethodTree constructor) {
TreePath constructorPath = cmAtf.getPath(constructor);
ClassTree classTree = TreePathUtil.enclosingClass(constructorPath);

for (Tree member : classTree.getMembers()) {
// (1) Disallow non-null inline initializer on the same field declaration.
if (member instanceof VariableTree) {
VariableTree decl = (VariableTree) member;
VariableElement declElement = TreeUtils.elementFromDeclaration(decl);
if (field.equals(declElement)
&& decl.getInitializer() != null
&& decl.getInitializer().getKind() != Tree.Kind.NULL_LITERAL) {
return false;
}
continue;
}
// (2) Disallow assignment in any instance initializer block.
if (member instanceof BlockTree) {
BlockTree initBlock = (BlockTree) member;
if (initBlock.isStatic()) {
continue;
}
// The variables accessed from within the anonymous class need to be effectively final, so
// AtomicBoolean is used here.
Comment on lines +1705 to +1706
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Minor: Update comment wording for precision.

The comment mentions "anonymous class" but the code uses a TreeScanner. Consider updating to "The variables accessed from within the TreeScanner need to be effectively final".

Based on past review comments.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
checker/src/main/java/org/checkerframework/checker/resourceleak/MustCallConsistencyAnalyzer.java
around lines 1705-1706, update the comment that currently references an
"anonymous class" to accurately refer to the TreeScanner being used; change it
to something like: "The variables accessed from within the TreeScanner need to
be effectively final, so AtomicBoolean is used here." Make the edit only to the
comment text to improve precision.

AtomicBoolean isInitialized = new AtomicBoolean(false);
initBlock.accept(
new TreeScanner<Void, Void>() {
@Override
public Void visitAssignment(AssignmentTree assignmentTree, Void unused) {
ExpressionTree lhs = assignmentTree.getVariable();
Element lhsElement = TreeUtils.elementFromTree(lhs);
if (field.equals(lhsElement)) {
isInitialized.set(true);
return null;
}
return super.visitAssignment(assignmentTree, unused);
}

@Override
public Void visitMethodInvocation(MethodInvocationTree node, Void unused) {
// Any side-effecting method call in an initializer block could write to the field.
if (!cmAtf.isSideEffectFree(TreeUtils.elementFromUse(node))) {
isInitialized.set(true);
return null;
}
return super.visitMethodInvocation(node, unused);
}
},
null);
if (isInitialized.get()) {
return false;
}
}
}

// (3) Reject constructor chaining via `this(...)`.
// If this constructor chains, the "first write" can occur in the callee constructor.
if (callsThisConstructor(constructor)) {
return false;
}

// (4) & (5): Single-pass scan in source order.
// For each top-level statement, descend into its subtree and:
// - If we encounter an assignment to the same field:
// * if it is the current assignment -> first write -> return true
// * otherwise (earlier assignment) -> not first write -> return false
// - If we encounter any method call before seeing the current assignment
// (other than a super(...) ctor call) -> return false
List<? extends StatementTree> stmts = constructor.getBody().getStatements();
for (StatementTree st : stmts) {
Boolean scanResult = ConstructorFirstWriteScanner.scan(st, assignment, field, cmAtf);
if (scanResult != null) {
return scanResult;
}
}
// The current assignment was not found in the constructor body, conservatively return false.
return false;
}

/**
* Returns true if the given constructor delegates to another constructor in the same class using
* a {@code this(...)} call as its first statement.
*
* @param constructor a constructor method
* @return {@code true} if the constructor starts with a {@code this(...)} call
*/
private boolean callsThisConstructor(MethodTree constructor) {
List<? extends StatementTree> statements = constructor.getBody().getStatements();
if (statements.isEmpty()) {
return false;
}
// This code must be revisited when "JEP 482: Flexible Constructor Bodies" is finalized,
// because then a call to `this` need not be the very first statement in a constructor body.
StatementTree firstStmt = statements.get(0);
if (firstStmt instanceof ExpressionStatementTree) {
ExpressionTree expr = ((ExpressionStatementTree) firstStmt).getExpression();
if (expr instanceof MethodInvocationTree) {
return TreeUtils.isThisConstructorCall((MethodInvocationTree) expr);
}
}
return false;
}

/**
* Checks that the method that encloses an assignment is marked with @CreatesMustCallFor
* annotation whose target is the object whose field is being re-assigned.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2563,4 +2716,104 @@ public static String collectionToString(Collection<BlockWithObligations> bwos) {
return result.toString();
}
}

/**
* Visitor that determines whether a given assignment in a constructor is the first write to its
* field before any earlier assignment or side-effecting call.
*
* <p>This performs a single AST traversal in source order and is deliberately conservative: it
* does not reason about control flow or path feasibility.
*/
private static final class ConstructorFirstWriteScanner extends TreeScanner<Boolean, Void> {

/** The assignment under test within the constructor. */
private final Tree assignment;

/** The field potentially written by the assignment. */
private final VariableElement field;

/** The annotated type factory, used for a method's side-effect reasoning. */
private final RLCCalledMethodsAnnotatedTypeFactory cmAtf;

/**
* Creates a scanner that checks if {@code assignment} is the first write to {@code field}
* within the current constructor. The scan stops as soon as a decisive result (true/false) is
* encountered.
*
* @param assignment the assignment being analyzed
* @param field the field written by that assignment
* @param cmAtf the type factory for side-effect reasoning
*/
private ConstructorFirstWriteScanner(
Tree assignment, VariableElement field, RLCCalledMethodsAnnotatedTypeFactory cmAtf) {
this.assignment = assignment;
this.field = field;
this.cmAtf = cmAtf;
}

/**
* Runs the scan for a single top-level constructor statement.
*
* @param root the statement to scan
* @param assignment the target assignment
* @param field the field being checked
* @param cmAtf the factory for side-effect reasoning
* @return {@code true} if the assignment is the first write, {@code false} if a prior
* assignment or a method call with side-effect is found, or {@code null} if neither is
* encountered
*/
static Boolean scan(
StatementTree root,
Tree assignment,
VariableElement field,
RLCCalledMethodsAnnotatedTypeFactory cmAtf) {
return new ConstructorFirstWriteScanner(assignment, field, cmAtf).scan(root, null);
}

@Override
public Boolean visitAssignment(AssignmentTree node, Void p) {
Element lhsEl = TreeUtils.elementFromUse(node.getVariable());
if (field == lhsEl) {
// Found an assignment to the same field:
// - current assignment → first write → true
// - earlier assignment → not first → false
return node == assignment ? Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE;
}
return super.visitAssignment(node, p);
}

@Override
public Boolean visitMethodInvocation(MethodInvocationTree node, Void p) {
// Treat any method call before the target assignment as side-effecting, unless it is
// side-effect-free method or a super(...) constructor call.
if (cmAtf.isSideEffectFree(TreeUtils.elementFromUse(node))
|| TreeUtils.isSuperConstructorCall(node)) {
return super.visitMethodInvocation(node, p);
}
return Boolean.FALSE;
}

@Override
public Boolean visitNewClass(NewClassTree node, Void p) {
// An object creation with side effects can modify constructor fields (e.g., via Helper(this),
// where `this` can be modified in Helper’s constructor).
if (cmAtf.isSideEffectFree(TreeUtils.elementFromUse(node))) {
return super.visitNewClass(node, p);
}
return Boolean.FALSE;
}

@Override
public Boolean reduce(Boolean r1, Boolean r2) {
// Return the first decisive result. FALSE dominates (unsafe earlier write/call), then TRUE
// (reached target safely), null means inconclusive so far.
if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(r1) || Boolean.FALSE.equals(r2)) {
return Boolean.FALSE;
}
if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(r1) || Boolean.TRUE.equals(r2)) {
return Boolean.TRUE;
}
return null;
}
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
package org.checkerframework.checker.test.junit;

import java.io.File;
import java.util.List;
import org.checkerframework.checker.resourceleak.ResourceLeakChecker;
import org.checkerframework.framework.test.CheckerFrameworkPerDirectoryTest;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

/**
* Tests for validating safe suppression of resource leak warnings when a private field is
* initialized for the first time inside a constructor.
*
* <p>These tests check that the checker allows first-time constructor-based assignments (when safe)
* and continues to report reassignments or leaks in all other cases (e.g., after method calls,
* initializer blocks, etc.).
*/
public class ResourceLeakFirstInitConstructorTest extends CheckerFrameworkPerDirectoryTest {
public ResourceLeakFirstInitConstructorTest(List<File> testFiles) {
super(
testFiles,
ResourceLeakChecker.class,
"resourceleak-firstinitconstructor",
"-AwarnUnneededSuppressions",
"-encoding",
"UTF-8");
}

@Parameters
public static String[] getTestDirs() {
return new String[] {"resourceleak-firstinitconstructor"};
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
// Test: Field is initialized in one constructor and reassigned in another via this() chaining.
// Expected: Warning in constructor and open() due to reassignments.

import java.io.FileInputStream;
import org.checkerframework.checker.calledmethods.qual.*;
import org.checkerframework.checker.mustcall.qual.*;

@InheritableMustCall({"close"})
class ConstructorChainingLeak {
private @Owning FileInputStream s;

public ConstructorChainingLeak() throws Exception {
this(42);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test like this one but where the this(42) call is replaced by a call to a super constructor? I'd like to at least codify the behavior in that scenario (I think it would be safe not to warn in that constructor, but it's okay if there's an FP now).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a test case for a constructor that calls super().
The suppression logic already handles super constructor calls correctly, so no false positive is reported solely due to the super() call.

// :: error: (required.method.not.called)
s = new FileInputStream("test.txt");
}

private ConstructorChainingLeak(int x) throws Exception {
s = new FileInputStream("test.txt");
}

// :: error: (missing.creates.mustcall.for)
public void open() {
try {
// :: error: (required.method.not.called)
s = new FileInputStream("test.txt");
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}

@EnsuresCalledMethods(value = "this.s", methods = "close")
public void close() {
try {
s.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
}
Loading
Loading