You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it seems that whitelist have no N in all the barcodes, but the extracted barcode by proc10X in some reads showed N , and the status tag also show MATHCH. I wonder if it is normal ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So I suppose in the code an 'N' defaults to an 'A' because of the two bit hashing scheme and so will MATCH when it happens to pair with an A in the whitelist. I've added a check in the lastest commit for any 'N's in the bc seq first and then immediately check for 1-mismatch, which is ok if the N is the only mismatch. So any 'N' in the gem barcode region should not longer "MATCH" a whitelisted barcode, but ok to be MISMATCH1. Needs testing though
it seems that whitelist have no N in all the barcodes, but the extracted barcode by proc10X in some reads showed N , and the status tag also show MATHCH. I wonder if it is normal ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: