-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
[Utils] Deprecate unused utils #2097
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kyle Sayers <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @kylesayrs, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request initiates the deprecation process for a collection of utility functions in Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request deprecates a large number of unused utility functions, which is a great cleanup effort. The changes are mostly straightforward additions of the @deprecated decorator. I've found a few areas for improvement:
- One of the deprecated functions has an incorrect
future_namesuggesting a wrong replacement. - For another function, the suggested replacement is only valid for one of its modes of operation.
- I've also added suggestions for improving clarity around the deprecation of a class and noted a side effect of deprecating the
deprecation_warningfunction.
Overall, these are good changes that will improve the maintainability of the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Sayers <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Sayers <[email protected]>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to llm-compressor. Please add the ready label when the PR is ready for review. Note: This is required to complete the testing suite, please only add the label once the PR is code complete and local testing has been performed. |
Purpose
After Release