Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

completeness of RDFS entailment rules #76

Open
pfps opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

completeness of RDFS entailment rules #76

pfps opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jan 31, 2025

We don't have a completeness proof for the RDFS entailment rules (yet).

This is not a fatal problem, but we should make sure that the document doesn't claim completeness if we don't have a proof.
@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 31, 2025
@franconi franconi mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pfps