Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TotalQuickFilter: Alternative existing extension for TB 78 #99

Open
LatinSuD opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 8 comments
Open

TotalQuickFilter: Alternative existing extension for TB 78 #99

LatinSuD opened this issue Nov 7, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@LatinSuD
Copy link

LatinSuD commented Nov 7, 2020

I don't mean to abandon Expression Search, but in the meanwhile I have found this alternative that works in TB 78:

TotalQuickFilter
https://bitbucket.org/alta8888/totalquickfilter/wiki/Home

It works in a different way, and it will require you to use the mouse while editing expressions.
But I think most of the search expressions can be done with it.

Example 1

For example, to search for this expression:
f:john or s:important
You would have to:

  1. Enable the "From" and "Subject" buttons, and only those buttons.
  2. Make sure that "OR" button is enabled.
  3. Then type your comma separated values in order: john,important

Example 2

It may look more complicated than expression search, but in some cases it may be simpler.
This search expression:
f:john or f:anne

Becomes:

  1. Enable From button only.
  2. Type: john | anne
@kiv57
Copy link

kiv57 commented Nov 9, 2020

Hi,

Thank you for this suggestion.

I won't install it : no source code, and it requires total access to thunderbird and the computer... is it really necessary for a search tool ?
Edit : and why isn't it on addons.thunderbird.net ?

@alta88
Copy link

alta88 commented Nov 10, 2020

Hello ES fans, I am the author of TotalQuickFilter and several other extensions as well as a longtime Thunderbird contributor.

I'm considering either adopting ES or moving it feature for feature into TotalQuickFilter, both of which would be a large refactoring to bring it into the webextension/experiments world and future compatibility, if I can determine the work can be sponsored/funded. There may not be a large enough user base to support a kickstarter type project.

In the meantime, feel free to see if TotalQuickFilter works for your use case. Anyone can view and check the source in the .xpi; it isn't compiled or obfuscated or minified; it doesn't phone home or collect anything.

@stdedos
Copy link
Contributor

stdedos commented Nov 11, 2020

If indeed that's the case, why not just add it in the repo?
I have seen this https://bitbucket.org/alta8888/totalquickfilter/src/master/ repository; the usernames match "a lot alike".

@pfolk
Copy link

pfolk commented Nov 16, 2020

I can determine the work can be sponsored/funded. There may not be a large enough user base to support a kickstarter type project.

@alta88 I'd be up for helping sponsor your work, especially if it got better searching into the mainline codebase (but either way, willing to chip in)

@Izwbusr
Copy link

Izwbusr commented Nov 21, 2020

I would contribute as well. A powerful search bar is extremely useful.

@LatinSuD
Copy link
Author

LatinSuD commented Nov 26, 2020

To make things clear:

  1. I have no relation with TotalQuickFilter

  2. I've been using it for a few weeks and I still prefer ES over TQF

  3. I was just bringing an alternative that works, although is not as versatile and quick to use.
    I created this "tutorial" for those who would give it a try, to help with the migration.

  4. I hope that eventually we will get a working fix for ES. It's just that this time it's not going to be a 1 line patch.

  5. Why is everyone opening a new issue to give their own opinion??

@stdedos
Copy link
Contributor

stdedos commented Nov 26, 2020

We decided to bomb your issue instead 😃
Hopefully that will solve 5.

@xlovinglyx
Copy link

this has nothing to do with gmail ui addon. NO MAIL FILTERS EXPRESSION SEARCH OPTIONS. & you guys keep fantasizing on it..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants