|
| 1 | +# Kagenti Project Governance |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +The Kagenti project is dedicated to providing a secure, open source platform for |
| 4 | +deploying and orchestrating autonomous AI agents on Kubernetes. This governance |
| 5 | +explains how the project is run. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +- [Values](#values) |
| 8 | +- [Maintainers](#maintainers) |
| 9 | +- [Becoming a Maintainer](#becoming-a-maintainer) |
| 10 | +- [Meetings](#meetings) |
| 11 | +- [Code of Conduct Enforcement](#code-of-conduct) |
| 12 | +- [Security Response Team](#security-response-team) |
| 13 | +- [Voting](#voting) |
| 14 | +- [Modifications](#modifying-this-charter) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Values |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +The Kagenti project and its leadership embrace the following values: |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +* Openness: Communication and decision-making happens in the open and is |
| 21 | + discoverable for future reference. As much as possible, all discussions and |
| 22 | + work take place in public forums and open repositories. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +* Fairness: All stakeholders have the opportunity to provide feedback and |
| 25 | + submit contributions, which will be considered on their merits. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +* Community over Product or Company: Sustaining and growing our community |
| 28 | + takes priority over shipping code or sponsors' organizational goals. Each |
| 29 | + contributor participates in the project as an individual. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +* Inclusivity: We innovate through different perspectives and skill sets, |
| 32 | + which can only be accomplished in a welcoming and respectful environment. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +* Participation: Responsibilities within the project are earned through |
| 35 | + participation, and there is a clear path up the contributor ladder into |
| 36 | + leadership positions. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +## Maintainers |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +Kagenti Maintainers have write access to the |
| 41 | +[project GitHub repository](https://github.com/kagenti/kagenti). They can merge their |
| 42 | +own patches or patches from others. The current maintainers can be found in |
| 43 | +[MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md). Maintainers collectively manage the |
| 44 | +project's resources and contributors. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +This privilege is granted with some expectation of responsibility: maintainers |
| 47 | +are people who care about the Kagenti project and want to help it grow and |
| 48 | +improve. A maintainer is not just someone who can make changes, but someone who |
| 49 | +has demonstrated their ability to collaborate with the team, get the most |
| 50 | +knowledgeable people to review code and docs, contribute high-quality code, and |
| 51 | +follow through to fix issues (in code or tests). |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +A maintainer is a contributor to the project's success and a citizen helping |
| 54 | +the project succeed. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +The collective team of all Maintainers is known as the Maintainer Council, which |
| 57 | +is the governing body for the project. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +### Becoming a Maintainer |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +To become a Maintainer you need to demonstrate the following: |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +* commitment to the project: |
| 64 | + * participate in discussions, contributions, code and documentation reviews |
| 65 | + for 3 or more months, |
| 66 | + * perform reviews for at least 15 non-trivial pull requests, |
| 67 | + * contribute at least 10 non-trivial pull requests and have them merged, |
| 68 | +* ability to write quality code and/or documentation, |
| 69 | +* ability to collaborate with the team, |
| 70 | +* understanding of how the team works (policies, processes for testing and code |
| 71 | + review, etc), |
| 72 | +* understanding of the project's code base and coding and documentation style. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +A new Maintainer must be proposed by an existing Maintainer by opening a PR |
| 75 | +against the root of the [kagenti repository](https://github.com/kagenti/kagenti) |
| 76 | +adding the nominee to MAINTAINERS.md. The nominee will add a comment to the PR |
| 77 | +testifying that they agree to all requirements of becoming a Maintainer. |
| 78 | +A simple majority of existing Maintainers must approve the PR. |
| 79 | +Maintainer nominations will be evaluated without prejudice |
| 80 | +to employer or demographics. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Maintainers who are selected will be granted the necessary GitHub rights, |
| 83 | +and invited to the |
| 84 | +[private maintainer mailing list](mailto:kagenti-maintainers@googlegroups.com). |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### Removing a Maintainer |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Maintainers may resign at any time if they feel that they will not be able to |
| 89 | +continue fulfilling their project duties. |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Maintainers may also be removed after being inactive, failure to fulfill their |
| 92 | +Maintainer responsibilities, violating the Code of Conduct, or other reasons. |
| 93 | +Inactivity is defined as a period of very low or no activity in the project |
| 94 | +for six months or more, with no definite schedule to return to full Maintainer |
| 95 | +activity. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +A Maintainer may be removed at any time by a 2/3 vote of the remaining |
| 98 | +maintainers. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +Depending on the reason for removal, a Maintainer may be converted to Emeritus |
| 101 | +status. Emeritus Maintainers will still be consulted on some project matters, |
| 102 | +and can be rapidly returned to Maintainer status if their availability changes. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +## Meetings |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +Time zones permitting, Maintainers are expected to participate in the public |
| 107 | +developer meeting, which occurs weekly. |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +Maintainers will also have closed meetings in order to discuss security reports |
| 110 | +or Code of Conduct violations. Such meetings should be scheduled by any |
| 111 | +Maintainer on receipt of a security issue or CoC report. All current Maintainers |
| 112 | +must be invited to such closed meetings, except for any Maintainer who is |
| 113 | +accused of a CoC violation. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## Code of Conduct |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +[Code of Conduct](./CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) violations by community members will |
| 118 | +be discussed and resolved on the |
| 119 | +[private Maintainer mailing list](mailto:kagenti-maintainers@googlegroups.com). |
| 120 | +If a Maintainer is directly involved in the report, the Maintainers will instead |
| 121 | +designate two Maintainers to work with the Code of Conduct Committee in |
| 122 | +resolving it. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +## Security Response Team |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +The Maintainers will appoint a Security Response Team to handle security |
| 127 | +reports. This committee may simply consist of the Maintainer Council themselves. |
| 128 | +If this responsibility is delegated, the Maintainers will appoint a team of at |
| 129 | +least two contributors to handle it. The Maintainers will review who is assigned |
| 130 | +to this at least once a year. |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +The Security Response Team is responsible for handling all reports of security |
| 133 | +holes and breaches according to the [security policy](SECURITY.md). |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +## Voting |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +While most business in Kagenti is conducted by |
| 138 | +"[lazy consensus](https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html)", |
| 139 | +periodically the Maintainers may need to vote on specific actions or changes. |
| 140 | +A vote can be taken on |
| 141 | +[the developer mailing list](mailto:kagenti-contributors@googlegroups.com) or |
| 142 | +[the private Maintainer mailing list](mailto:kagenti-maintainers@googlegroups.com) |
| 143 | +for security or conduct matters. Any Maintainer may demand a vote be taken. |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +Most votes require a simple majority of all Maintainers to succeed, except where |
| 146 | +otherwise noted. Two-thirds majority votes mean at least two-thirds of all |
| 147 | +existing maintainers. |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +## Modifying this Charter |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +Changes to this Governance and its supporting documents may be approved by |
| 152 | +a 2/3 vote of the Maintainers. |
0 commit comments