You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2025. It is now read-only.
I can only imagine it must get tedious chasing the latest version of this library. However, I would still like to ask if it could be considered upgrading to 105+, given that 92 has been in preview for 2 months.
My main motivator is the new TextControl components that began to be introduced in the 90s, but only really well supported in the later versions. These are clearly intended to replace the Controller classes so we don't want to start any new development using these outdated controls. Another strong motivator is we require the use of density which only the newer controls support (and the older ones likely never will).
That explains my motivations, I'm sure others will have their own reasons given the number of changes from 92 to 105
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am also happy to assist in any way that may help with creating these bindings. I understand that even once sharpie is run over it, a vast amount of manual (re)patching must be done, which is a noisy and bulky process.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I can only imagine it must get tedious chasing the latest version of this library. However, I would still like to ask if it could be considered upgrading to
105
+, given that92
has been in preview for 2 months.My main motivator is the new
TextControl
components that began to be introduced in the90
s, but only really well supported in the later versions. These are clearly intended to replace theController
classes so we don't want to start any new development using these outdated controls. Another strong motivator is we require the use ofdensity
which only the newer controls support (and the older ones likely never will).That explains my motivations, I'm sure others will have their own reasons given the number of changes from
92
to105
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: