-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
Skip version check #123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Do I understand correctly that universal-ctags is a fork of Exuberant Ctags >= 5.8? In that case it should be fully compatible indeed (until they start making backwards incompatible changes ;-) so I can see if I can get the version check to accept "Universal Ctags Development". |
I was actually waiting for a response from you before investigate more. 👼 I switched to it like 1 week ago and except for your plugin I didn't encounter any problem. I saw in there doc that they are merging exuberant patches so I would say they are backward compatible. They have a specific section for this in there doc: https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/blob/master/docs/tracking.rst#exuberant-ctags |
Refer to issue 123 on GitHub for details: #123
I just published vim-easytags version 3.11 where I've tried to at least make the version check accept Universal Ctags as an alternative to Exuberant Ctags. I don't have time to try Universal Ctags at the moment, so I can't confirm if this is enough to get things going. Can you give it a try and report back? Thanks for the feedback! |
After a few hours with several languages (c, go, rust, python) still no problem. Thanks a lot. 😄 |
Hi, I'm a developer of universal ctags. These days I'm planing releasing 1.0.0. As the first step I changed the output of ctags --version.
|
I have found a fix is available: Wraul@f5746bd ! |
@xolox I'm still seeing the following. Is that intended?
|
@xolox whoops -- I completely overlooked the date on the your earlier comment, sorry D: |
@xolox Any possible news on this ? (see @JKRMR message above) |
@Bew78LesellB I ended up using the following as a workaround, if it's helpful at all: " suppress ctags version warning (since universal-ctags)
let g:easytags_suppress_ctags_warning = 1 |
@xolox Using the latest universal-ctags version:
Running with exuberant-ctags gives me warnings and fails to work at all (doesn't even work manually):
Running latest maxOS Sierra
All I can find on tags of any kind are pretty old comments (this thread being the latest almost a year old) -- perhaps there's a mother similar solution people are using these days? |
(I don't use vim, so what I write here may be pointless.) If you have a trouble in output format of ctags, consider to use These days Following example shows the difference.
|
For anyone else stumbling upon here I ended up following the vim plugin https://github.com/majutsushi/tagbar/wiki#jsctags-depends-on-tern--recommended- |
I am trying to use universal-ctags, which is more or less exuberant-ctags maintained, so it should be completely compatible.
The problem is that easytags considers this version incompatible. This come from the fact that universal-ctags isn't versioned, its version is always "Development".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: