You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The call stack is full of cell.fx.checkCircularReference. Rerunning with checkCircularReference: false, fails similarly on cell.fx.processDependency.
There are about 4500 cells, defined in the data: property, not on DOM elements. No circular dependencies, I think (the original Excel didn't have any). Perhaps I've just reached a natural limit? Could dependency handling be flattened, i.e. turned into an iterative rather than recursive algorithm?
It seems a great idea and maybe calculation will be faster, but, I think the process to make dependency tree flattened will need more effort to implement.
Hello @ikhsan017 ,
I am also facing the same error message "too much recursion". But in my case, it does not matter If I make circular references as true or false.
One additional thing:
When I make circular reference to true, then the value in the cell where I have written formula gets blank. I get the calculated values when I make circular reference to false.
Please look into it asap.
Thank you so much for this library. It is really helping me.
The call stack is full of cell.fx.checkCircularReference. Rerunning with checkCircularReference: false, fails similarly on cell.fx.processDependency.
There are about 4500 cells, defined in the data: property, not on DOM elements. No circular dependencies, I think (the original Excel didn't have any). Perhaps I've just reached a natural limit? Could dependency handling be flattened, i.e. turned into an iterative rather than recursive algorithm?
Here: http://spreadsheet.aviscuriosa.com/browserscript-calx2.0.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: