|
| 1 | +# Daedalus Notes |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## 3.1 (Primitive Parsers) |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +* `^<value>` is achievable through `compute` |
| 6 | +* `Fail <msg>` requires a refactor we have discussed but never implemented |
| 7 | + * This could be a modification of `Fail` itself, or a wrapper using `StyleHint` |
| 8 | +* We don't have a notion of character classes for the parser `$[c]`, but we could emulate this with `ByteSet` constants |
| 9 | +* The closest thing to `Match <string>` is `is_bytes`, which stores an N-Tuple ([issue #260](https://github.com/yeslogic/doodle/issues/260) discusses this) |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## 3.2 (Sequential Composition) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +The syntax `{ P1; ...; Pn }` can be emulated with `LetFormat`/`MonadSeq`. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Example Translations |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +```ddl |
| 19 | +def Add2 = |
| 20 | + block |
| 21 | + let x = BEUInt64 |
| 22 | + let y = BEUInt64 |
| 23 | + ^ x + y |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +def StatementSemi = |
| 26 | + block |
| 27 | + $$ = Statement |
| 28 | + $[';'] |
| 29 | +``` |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +```rust |
| 32 | +let add2 = |
| 33 | + chain( |
| 34 | + base.u64be(), "x", |
| 35 | + chain( |
| 36 | + base.u64be(), |
| 37 | + "y", |
| 38 | + compute(add(var("x"), var("y"))) |
| 39 | + ) |
| 40 | + ); |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +let statement_semi = |
| 43 | + chain( |
| 44 | + statement, // defined elsewhere, |
| 45 | + "ret", |
| 46 | + monad_seq( |
| 47 | + is_byte(b';'), |
| 48 | + compute(var("ret")) |
| 49 | + ) |
| 50 | + ); |
| 51 | +``` |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +## 3.3 (Parallel Composition) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +There is currently no way of performing *unbiased* composition in `doodle`; all parallel compositions |
| 56 | +are first-come-first-served and will bias towards the first non-error result. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +`<|` is therefore supported, while `|` is not. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## 3.4 (Repetition) |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +* Kleene Star - `Many <P>` is just `Repeat`, while `Many (1..) <P>` is `Repeat` |
| 63 | +* Kleene Star with State - At least some cases of `many (x = s) <P>` can be emulated with `Map(Repeat, LeftFold)`, while `AccumUntil` might be usable in other cases; there may be cases where neither are applicable, in which case a more bespoke `Format` may be required. |
| 64 | +* `map (k,v in c) <P>` and `for (x = s; k,v in c) <P>` could be emulated with `ForEach`, at least in certain instances. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +## 3.5 (Branching) |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +* `case-of` (and, by extension, `if-then-else`) appear one-to-one with `Match` |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +## 3.6 (Coercions) |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +* There are no format-level types per-se, but various `Expr`s like `AsU64` and family accomplish much-the-same, albeit in a closed class rather with a constructive syntax. |
| 73 | + * `as?` (dynamic safe coercion) is closest to what we have, since `AsU{8,16,32,64}`/`AsChar` are runtime-checked; we currently have nothing of the sort of `as` (static safe) or `as!` (static lossy) coercion |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +## 5.1 (Bitdata) |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +Through helpers like `bit_fields_u8` and so forth, which can be defined as-needed, we have a plausible |
| 78 | +analogue to the `bitdata` declarations in Daedalus. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +However, the current implementation of `BitFieldKind` is somewhat restrictive, in the following ways, compared to `bitdata`: |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +* It does not support type-coercions (e.g. u8 packed in a u16) |
| 83 | +* It does not support fixed-bits checking other than all-zero |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +These are features that could be added with various caveats, if necessary. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +### Examples |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +```ddl |
| 90 | +bitdata Packed where |
| 91 | + x: uint 8 |
| 92 | + 0xFFFF |
| 93 | + y: uint 8 |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +bitdata Uni where |
| 96 | + value = { get: Packed } |
| 97 | + null = 0 |
| 98 | +``` |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +```rust |
| 101 | +use doodle::helper::BitFieldKind::*; |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +let packed = bit_fields_u32([ // <- this is not yet defined |
| 104 | + BitsField { field_name: "x", bit_width: 8 }, |
| 105 | + Reserved { bit_width: 16, check_zero: false }, |
| 106 | + BitsField { field_name: "y", bit_width: 8 }, |
| 107 | +]); |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +let uni = union_nondet([ |
| 110 | + ("null", is_bytes(&[0; 4])), |
| 111 | + ("value", packed), |
| 112 | +]); |
| 113 | +``` |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +This is more of a parse-level directive than a data-type declaration, however, |
| 116 | +as while in Daedalus the two are implicitly specified with the same declaration, |
| 117 | +in `doodle` the data-type is a synthetic implication of the parse declaration, |
| 118 | +and cannot be used in coercions; for that, we would need a separate declaration |
| 119 | +of a dependent `u32 -?-> Packed` computation that could then be fed in arbitrary |
| 120 | +arguments to interpret as `Packed`. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +```rust |
| 123 | +use doodle::helper::BitFieldKind::*; |
| 124 | +let as_packed = module.define_format_args( |
| 125 | + "Packed-Coerce", |
| 126 | + [(Label::Borrowed("raw"), ValueType::Base(BaseType::U32))], |
| 127 | + cast_u32_bit_fields( // <- also not defined, but furthermore has no archetype |
| 128 | + var("raw"), |
| 129 | + [ |
| 130 | + BitsField { field_name: "x", bit_width: 8 }, |
| 131 | + Reserved { bit_width: 16, check_zero: false }, |
| 132 | + BitsField { field_name: "y", bit_width: 8 }, |
| 133 | + ] |
| 134 | + ) |
| 135 | +); |
| 136 | +``` |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +## 5.2 (Automatic ADT Synthesis) |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +We have no first-class types in the specification language of `doodle`, and all |
| 141 | +types are implied through synthesis over the declared formats and expressions. |
| 142 | +As a result, type-ascriptions are syntactically unavailable. |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +Even currently, we can still at least ensure that two parsers have mutually |
| 145 | +compatible types, by defining a declaration-check marker-format that we run |
| 146 | +through type-checking but discard afterwards: |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +```rust |
| 149 | +let point = module.define_format("types.point", record([("x", base.u8()), ("y", base.u8())])); |
| 150 | +let point_x = module.define_format("types.point_x", record([("x", base.u8()), ("y", is_byte(0))])); |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +let __type_proof = module.define_format( |
| 153 | + "__TYPE_PROOF", |
| 154 | + monad_seq( |
| 155 | + union([point.call(), point_x.call()]), |
| 156 | + /* we can sequence other type-compatibility assertion-formats here as well */ |
| 157 | + Format::EMPTY, |
| 158 | + ) |
| 159 | +); |
| 160 | +``` |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +Because every format needs a reified type for the module to be usable, but these |
| 163 | +type-ascriptions need not be a bijection, there would be no implicitly-defined |
| 164 | +alias `type PointX = Point` as would be synthesized by the corresponding |
| 165 | +Daedalus declarations; instead, whichever type-name is preferred would win, and |
| 166 | +both formats would receive verbatim-identical type-ascriptions. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +While tagged unions in general are supportable, the example given for tagged |
| 171 | +unions cannot be constructed in `doodle` because of a lack of support for |
| 172 | +auto-recursive and mutually-recursive format-constructs. Implementing these is |
| 173 | +not *a priori* impossible, but would require a noticeable investment of effort |
| 174 | +into a design to support this, which would most notably require a |
| 175 | +termination-rule for otherwise infinitely-recursive type-checking. |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +## 6 (Lookahead and Stream Manipulation) |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +The concept of a `Stream` is not first-class within the `Format` model of `doodle`, |
| 180 | +though there are various combinators that interact with it. |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +* `GetStream` does not obviously have a one-to-one equivalent in `doodle`, though constructs that use it may be replicable in other ways |
| 183 | +* `Drop n s` does not properly exist as a first-class construction but can be emulated with some degree of ingenuity |
| 184 | +* `Take n s` itself is not quite analogous to anything in `doodle` |
| 185 | +* `SetStream` does not properly exist as a first-class construction but can be emulated with some degree of ingenuity |
| 186 | +* `Chunk n P` is equivalent to `Slice` |
| 187 | +* `Lookahead P` is equivalent to `Peek` |
| 188 | +* `WithStream` can be emulated using `DecodeBytes` up to a certain degree, where if the parser itself is responsible for determining where the stream ends, there may be issues in capturing the stream into a suitable buffer. |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +### Example |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +```ddl |
| 193 | +block |
| 194 | + let base = GetStream |
| 195 | + Many block |
| 196 | + let offset = Word64 |
| 197 | + let here = GetStream |
| 198 | + SetStream (Drop offset base) |
| 199 | + $$ = ParseObject |
| 200 | + SetStream here |
| 201 | +``` |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +```rust |
| 204 | +chain( |
| 205 | + Format::Pos, |
| 206 | + "base", |
| 207 | + repeat( |
| 208 | + chain(base.u64be(), "offset", |
| 209 | + with_relative_offset(Some(var("base")), var("offset"), parse_object) |
| 210 | + ) |
| 211 | + ) |
| 212 | +) |
| 213 | +``` |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +## 7 (Eager vs. Lazy) |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +There is currently no support, at any layer, for parse-level laziness in the |
| 218 | +`doodle` processing model; there is some value-level laziness involving |
| 219 | +constructed sequences, but that is more of an representation-level optimization |
| 220 | +than a feature of the processing model, and aside from performance concerns, |
| 221 | +nothing would change if it were eliminated. |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +Multiple paths cannot be explored in parallel, both for unbounded/indefinite-length |
| 224 | +repetitions as well as for more explicit alternations over N branches. There are currently only two places where nondeterministic unions are used: |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +* At the top-level, for alternating between distinct data-formats (e.g. png, OpenType, gzip); and secondly, to allow fallback to uninterpreted bytes during speculative |
| 227 | +parsing of zlib-compressed UTF-8 in an `iTXt` PNG-chunk. |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +The latter usage is more of a band-aid against unwanted parse-failure, and due |
| 230 | +to the limitations of the error-propagation model whereby high-confidence |
| 231 | +partial-parses of a given top-format are nevertheless rejected altogether when |
| 232 | +even a single, possibly trivial component encounters uncaught parse-failure. |
| 233 | +Aside from mitigation within the operational model that would allow |
| 234 | +determinations such as 'correct format, malformed data', there are ways to get |
| 235 | +around this locally without adjusting the model, by using a separate construct |
| 236 | +from `UnionNondet` to avoid coupling one form of speculative parsing to the only |
| 237 | +version of something like that in the current implementation of `doodle`: |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +```rust |
| 240 | +fn try_with_fallback(f0: Format, f1: Format) -> Format { |
| 241 | + TryWithFallback(Box::new(f0), Box::new(f1)) |
| 242 | +} |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | +/* .. */ |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | +let zlib_utf8txt_or_raw = |
| 247 | + try_with_fallback( |
| 248 | + fmt_variant("valid", zlib_utf8text), |
| 249 | + fmt_variant("invalid", repeat(base.u8())), |
| 250 | + ); |
| 251 | +``` |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +This can be used in a broader sense, as a more generic 'permit local failure gracefully' |
| 254 | +construct: |
| 255 | + |
| 256 | +```rust |
| 257 | +fn permit_fail(f: Format, dummy: Expr) -> Format { |
| 258 | + TryWithFallback(Box::new(f), Box::new(compute(dummy))) |
| 259 | +} |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | +// vvv Usage Patterns vvv |
| 262 | +fn opt_success(f: Format) -> Format { |
| 263 | + permit_fail(fmt_some(f), expr_none()) |
| 264 | +} |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | +fn try_or_invalid(f: Format) -> Format { |
| 267 | + permit_fail(fmt_variant("valid", f), Expr::Variant("invalid".into(), Expr::UNIT)) |
| 268 | +} |
| 269 | +``` |
0 commit comments