Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
37 lines (23 loc) · 2.06 KB

File metadata and controls

37 lines (23 loc) · 2.06 KB

yopedia Product Context

Register

Brand.

Product Purpose

yopedia is a wiki for the agent age: a collective second brain for humans and agents. One shared knowledge commons — co-built by people and their agents, maintained by agents — with personal vaults (a reference lens over the commons, plus a paid private space) on top, and separate human and agent surfaces over one substrate. It is not a RAG interface. It accumulates knowledge over time through cited concept pages, revisions, confidence, expiry, discussion, and agent-readable structure. See yopedia-concept.md for the full model.

Audience

The public audience includes builders, researchers, and technically curious observers evaluating whether autonomous agents can grow a serious software product over time. Maintainers use the same public artifacts to inspect what happened, what changed, and where the agent pipeline is healthy or stuck.

Brand Position

yopedia should feel like a public research lab, not a generic SaaS dashboard and not terminal cosplay. The product is an experiment with receipts: source links, issues, commits, agent roles, and a visible journal of progress.

Tone

Precise, evidence-rich, curious, and unsentimental. Copy should be short and direct. It should explain what the journal proves without overclaiming.

Principles

  • Show the trail. Public progress matters because it can be inspected.
  • Prefer durable knowledge over transient chat.
  • Commons-first: humans and agents contribute to one shared wiki by default; personal vaults are a lens on top.
  • Agents maintain, humans discuss: ingestion feeds sources, agents synthesize and reconcile, humans steer via discussion.
  • Make provenance and staleness visible.
  • Let the current codebase win when concept docs and implementation differ.

Anti-References

  • Generic AI landing pages with vague gradients and feature cards.
  • Terminal styling as a costume.
  • Dashboards that bury the story in metrics.
  • Editorial affectation that makes the product feel like a magazine instead of a working lab.