You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed that stores that implement getitems can optimize retrieval of chunks when multiple keys are requested at once and that gpu decoders like nvjpeg2000 can take advantage of decoding multiple encoded jpeg chunks in batches.
So I was wondering if there are any plans to basically provide Array._process_chunks() in zarr that would be used instead of Array._process_chunk() in case the numcodecs codec would provide a method like decode_batch() or so.
Cheers,
Andreas 😃
I opened the discussion here, although it might be closer related to numcodecs. But discussions aren't activated on the numcodecs repository.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello everyone,
I've noticed that stores that implement
getitems
can optimize retrieval of chunks when multiple keys are requested at once and that gpu decoders like nvjpeg2000 can take advantage of decoding multiple encoded jpeg chunks in batches.So I was wondering if there are any plans to basically provide
Array._process_chunks()
in zarr that would be used instead ofArray._process_chunk()
in case the numcodecs codec would provide a method likedecode_batch()
or so.Cheers,
Andreas 😃
I opened the discussion here, although it might be closer related to numcodecs. But discussions aren't activated on the numcodecs repository.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions