Skip to content

build(boring-sys): simplify prefix_symbols build - #110

Merged
0x676e67 merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
build
Jan 1, 2026
Merged

build(boring-sys): simplify prefix_symbols build#110
0x676e67 merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
build

Conversation

@0x676e67

@0x676e67 0x676e67 commented Jan 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @0x676e67, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request simplifies the build logic for boring-sys by restructuring a platform compatibility check. The change ensures that the panic! for unsupported targets when using the prefix_symbols feature is only triggered if the feature itself is active, leading to a more streamlined and logically consistent build process.

Highlights

  • Build Logic Refinement: The conditional check that triggers a panic when the prefix_symbols feature is used on unsupported platforms (macOS, iOS, Windows) has been moved. It is now nested within the if config.features.prefix_symbols block, ensuring the check is only evaluated if the feature is actually enabled.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request simplifies the logic for handling the prefix_symbols feature by consolidating two checks into a single if block. This is a good refactoring that improves code clarity. I've added one suggestion to further improve readability by using a match statement, which is a more idiomatic way to handle such cases in Rust.

Comment thread boring-sys/build/main.rs Outdated
@0x676e67
0x676e67 merged commit f47ad91 into master Jan 1, 2026
25 checks passed
@0x676e67
0x676e67 deleted the build branch January 1, 2026 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant