AMIP: Use aerosols with updated 1849 and 2023 data #355
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1. Summary:
What has changed?
The historical aerosol ancillaries have been updated to use data from the CMIP7 inputs in the boundary years 1849 and 2023. See ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#119
Previously these years used duplicate data from 1850 and 2022.
This PR adds the updated ancillaries to the configuration.
Why was this done?
This change was made for consistency with the CO2 emissions files. The impacts are expected to be minimal, as only aerosol values seen by the model in Jan 1850 and Dec 2022 will be affected.
2. Issues Addressed:
3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, or model)
This change requires changes to (note pull request(s) where relevant):
4. Ad-hoc Testing
What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?
See plots of the total aerosol emissions in ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#119
5. CI Testing
!test reprohas been run6. Reproducibility
Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)
!test repro commithas been run.As the config starts in 1978, the run will be reproducible at the start. However, answers will change in the final month, December 2022
7. Performance
Has the model performance (say, throughput of model-years/wall-day) changed?
Input files not expected to affect performance
If yes, provide the numbers from your testing. Is the performance better or worse?
8. Manifests
Have you changed the executable, the input files and/or the restart files?
If yes, have you updated the manifests?
To update the manifests, run payu setup (in a cloned copy of your feature branch) with reproducibility tests turned off:
Then commit the newly created manifest files (under manifests/) only to the branch for this PR.
9. Documentation
Is the documentation updated?
10. Merge Strategy