Skip to content

Conversation

@shivansh31414
Copy link

@shivansh31414 shivansh31414 commented Dec 2, 2025

Description

This PR adds core documentation files to improve contributor onboarding and community clarity.
Specifically, it introduces:

  • DESCRIPTION.md → Overview of DebateAI, its purpose, and vision.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md → Step‑by‑step guide for new contributors.
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md → Standards for respectful collaboration.
  • PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md → Checklist and structure for consistent PRs.

Motivation

Clear documentation is essential for open source collaboration. These files:

  • Help new contributors understand the project quickly.
  • Provide guidance on how to contribute effectively.
  • Ensure community standards are upheld.
  • Streamline the review process with structured PRs.

Changes Made

  • Added four .md files in the repo root.
  • Excluded ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md and SECURITY.md (to be added separately).
  • Ensured LF line endings for consistency across platforms.

Related Issue

Closes #23

Checklist

  • Documentation files added
  • Markdown formatting verified
  • Linked to relevant issue

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Introduced Code of Conduct establishing community standards for respectful and inclusive behavior
    • Added contributor guidelines with getting started instructions and best practices
    • Added project description documenting DebateAI's features and platform vision
    • Added pull request template to standardize contribution submissions

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Walkthrough

Four new documentation files are being added to establish project governance and contributor guidelines: a Code of Conduct for community standards, Contributing guidelines with step-by-step processes, a Description explaining the DebateAI project, and a Pull Request template for standardized submissions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Community & Project Guidelines
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, DESCRIPTION.md
Added new documentation establishing community standards for respectful behavior, comprehensive contribution guidelines with Getting Started and Best Practices sections, and project overview describing DebateAI as a real-time debating platform with AI/human opponents
Development Workflow
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Added standard pull request template with Description, Related Issue(s), Checklist, and optional Screenshots sections

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Verify accuracy and completeness of project description in DESCRIPTION.md
  • Ensure Code of Conduct appropriately covers community expectations
  • Confirm Contributing guidelines are clear and actionable for new contributors
  • Review Pull Request template for necessary fields and clarity

Poem

🐰 A Code of Conduct, Contributors' Guide,
Templates and Descriptions, standing with pride!
Guidelines for all, both seasoned and new,
Building a community respectful and true! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Linked Issues check ❓ Inconclusive The PR addresses most requirements from issue #23: DESCRIPTION.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, and PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md are included. However, SECURITY.md and ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md are intentionally excluded per PR notes, making the implementation incomplete against all linked issue objectives. Clarify whether the exclusion of SECURITY.md and ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md is acceptable for this PR, or if they should be included to fully satisfy issue #23 requirements.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title specifically refers to adding CONTRIBUTING.md, which is one of four documentation files included in this PR. While CONTRIBUTING.md is present, the title does not reflect the broader scope of adding multiple core documentation files (DESCRIPTION.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md).
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All four files added (DESCRIPTION.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) directly align with the requirements specified in linked issue #23 for repository documentation and templates.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
DESCRIPTION.md (1)

17-17: Strengthen the closing statement for engagement.

Consider replacing "wants to improve" with a more dynamic verb to enhance reader engagement. For instance: "seeks to enhance," "strives to master," or "aims to perfect."

Example revision:

-We aim to democratize debate practice, making it engaging, scalable, and accessible to anyone who wants to improve their communication skills.
+We aim to democratize debate practice, making it engaging, scalable, and accessible to anyone who seeks to master their communication skills.
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)

1-3: Remove leading blank lines.

Lines 1–3 contain unnecessary leading blank lines. These should be removed for a cleaner document start.

-
-
-
# Contributing to DebateAI

19-20: Expand branch naming convention guidance (optional).

The example uses feature-name, but contributors may benefit from guidance on naming patterns for different change types (e.g., bugfix/, docs/, hotfix/). This is optional but helps maintain consistency.

Example enhancement:

2. **Create a Branch**  
   ```bash
-  git checkout -b feature-name
+  git checkout -b feature-name  # or bugfix/, docs/, hotfix/, etc.

</blockquote></details>
<details>
<summary>CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)</summary><blockquote>

`1-2`: **Remove leading blank lines (consistent with other docs).**

Lines 1–2 contain unnecessary leading blank lines that should be removed for consistency with documentation style.


```diff
-
-
# Code of Conduct
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d22372 and 93fa98f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1 hunks)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
  • DESCRIPTION.md (1 hunks)
  • PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
DESCRIPTION.md

[style] ~17-~17: Try replacing commonly used words with synonyms to make your writing more engaging.
Context: ..., and accessible to anyone who wants to improve their communication skills.

(IMPROVE_STRENGTHEN)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)

1-16: Well-structured template aligned with contribution guidelines.

The template provides a clear structure that aligns with CONTRIBUTING.md recommendations and includes all essential elements: description, issue linking, verification checklist, and optional visuals. The checklist items (code quality, tests, documentation, security) are appropriately scoped.

CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

38-41: LGTM on best practices section.

The Best Practices section covers key areas: code quality, testing, security, and communication. The guidance is clear and appropriately scoped for contributor onboarding.

Comment on lines +18 to +21
## Enforcement
- Report violations via GitHub Issues or email (maintainers will provide contact).
- Maintainers will review and act fairly.
- Consequences may include warnings, temporary bans, or permanent removal.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Clarify enforcement reporting mechanism and process.

The Enforcement section is incomplete in two ways:

  1. Line 19: "maintainers will provide contact" is circular—this IS the maintainer communication channel. Provide an actual email address or point to a specific issues template/label.

  2. Lines 18–21: The process lacks detail on review timeline, escalation path, and appeals mechanism. Consider adding expected response time and clarity on consequences.

Example enhancement:

## Enforcement
- Report violations via GitHub Issues (use label: `code-of-conduct`) or email: [email protected]
- Maintainers will review within 5 business days and act fairly.
- Consequences may include: warnings, temporary bans (1 month+), or permanent removal.
- Appeals can be submitted to [maintainers email] with additional context.

Note: Replace [email protected] and the email address with actual project contact information.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## Enforcement
- Report violations via GitHub Issues or email (maintainers will provide contact).
- Maintainers will review and act fairly.
- Consequences may include warnings, temporary bans, or permanent removal.
## Enforcement
- Report violations via GitHub Issues (use label: `code-of-conduct`) or email: [email protected]
- Maintainers will review within 5 business days and act fairly.
- Consequences may include: warnings, temporary bans (1 month+), or permanent removal.
- Appeals can be submitted to [maintainers email] with additional context.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

write a Description, Contributing.md , Code of conduct, Security policy, Issue templates, Pull request template

1 participant