This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
[RFC] trappy: add support for event callbacks #241
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d4439c
trappy: Improve performance of parser
bffdec0
trappy: Split out parsing of trace string into separate function
b1974af
trappy: Add support for ftrace event callbacks
dd299a8
trace: Add support for skipping build of dataframes
90c79d8
trappy/sched: Move line processing earlier
0dfed97
trappy/ftrace: normalize time early
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find this confusing - IMO this would be much clearer (no
continue):Not sure if this is just me..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PS this
getrusagestuff was originally added (by me) to get around the fact that Pandas was segfaulting, instead of raising a proper Python error, when it ran out of memory. It might be worth checking that the latest Pandas still has that problem; if it doesn't maybe we can drop this stuff entirely as it's pretty ugly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Brendan, the memory limit has never been a problem for me even for large data frames, I don't mind ripping it out altogether unless anyone else has an objection?
Not sure how much RAM you had, but why not rip it out yourself and see if you still hit it with new pandas? I agree its pretty ugly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I'll give it a try (I was using a VM with 1Gb memory).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I tested it and pandas still segfaults when you run out of memory, so we'll need to keep this hack.