-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
remove strong and weak labels on gradient strength #159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Coverage Report
File Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
… firebase when available
| height: calc( | ||
| 100vh - var(--header-height) - var(--recipe-select-height) - | ||
| var(--tab-height) - var(--footer-height) | ||
| var(--tab-height) - var(--footer-height) - var(--description-height) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
super nit: when switching from any recipe to multi-spheres, the re-run button shifts slightly (not fully fixed) because that recipe has more editable fields. I don’t think it’s blocking, just something I noticed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah good catch. I think that we'll address this in some follow up work for improvements to the scrollable area next week, I'm kinda leaving it at "the re-run button is consistently viewable, that's good enough for today"
| --recipe-select-height: 52px; | ||
| --tab-height: 62px; | ||
| --footer-height: 64px; | ||
| --description-height: 102px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm working on a dynamic fix for this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
awesome - Thao had some comments in slack in cellpack-site about improvements for the scrollable area, I'm just not a strong enough front end developer to knock that out in time today without introducing other bugs, so I did this bandaid fix for now
Problem
Saurabh's feedback in slack indicates that the strong / weak labels on gradient strength are misleading as they stand. We may add them back in with some other changes to wording, but for now we're just removing them to eliminate confusion.
Critical change:
Solution
Removed labels for weak and strong on for gradient strength and changed gradient strength description (both in fallback case in code and in firebase)
Based on feedback, also