Skip to content

integration: SAFA to SLIME public proof boundary#9

Open
AnathemaOfficial wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
integration/slime-proof
Open

integration: SAFA to SLIME public proof boundary#9
AnathemaOfficial wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
integration/slime-proof

Conversation

@AnathemaOfficial
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Bounded end-to-end integration proof demonstrating that the cleaned SAFA decision surface can hand off one action mapping to the cleaned public SLIME harness under explicit demo assumptions.

  • 3 commits, 2 files, +358 lines
  • docs/SAFA_SLIME_PUBLIC_PROOF.md — proof boundary doc (85 lines)
  • safa-core/examples/slime_public_proof.rs — reproducible Rust example (273 lines)

What this proof claims

  • SAFA ActionRequest parsing + validation
  • SAFA action-to-domain mapping via demo fixture
  • Handoff of (domain, magnitude) into SLIME public ingress
  • One observed AUTHORIZED outcome + one IMPOSSIBLE outcome

What this proof does NOT claim

  • Production readiness
  • Enterprise/private AB-S integration
  • Canonical-law completeness
  • Semantic equivalence SAFA domains ↔ SLIME canon domains
  • Unix socket deployment parity

Reproducible demo path

```powershell
cargo run -p safa-core --example slime_public_proof
```

Defaults to neighboring clone at `C:\Users\sebas\projects\slime-phase1b\SLIME\noncanon\implementation_bundle\slime-runner`. Override via `SLIME_RUNNER_DIR`.

Context

Consolidation of work done in a nested clone at `safa-phase1a/SAFA/` that was never pushed. Archived via this PR so the work survives cleanup of the nested checkout.

Test plan

  • CI green on master
  • Run proof locally: `cargo run -p safa-core --example slime_public_proof`
  • Verify AUTHORIZED + IMPOSSIBLE outcomes
  • Verify egress sink has exactly one 32-byte record

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant