hwdef: correct compilation for MFT-SEMA100 #28226
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
peterbarker
force-pushed
the
pr/fix-mft-100
branch
from
c942b0c to
a161af2
Compare
peterbarker
force-pushed
the
pr/fix-mft-100
branch
from
a161af2 to
bb68f44
Compare
andyp1per
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this board uses 2 128kB sectors for storage, meaning it is very short on space
Remove features we are likely to remove for everyone in 4.7
@EternAlmox - those 128kB sectors really do hurt the available flash on these boards.
We're looking at putting a feature in to use a single page of storage for parameters, but that's problematic from both a migration POV and from a data sanctity POV (there's a race condition when "compacting" storage when it fills up). We'll see how we go.