Add support for package and mode status keywords

[teutoburg]

Sibling of AstarVienna/irdb#201.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 29.41176% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.08%. Comparing base (86c3e1f) to head (c689b9e).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
scopesim/commands/user_commands.py	29.41%	12 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #509      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.16%   77.08%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines        8204     8218      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         6331     6335       +4     
- Misses       1873     1883      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[teutoburg]

Now codecough is complaining, perhaps we should put a status also in tests/mocks/basic_instrument/default.yaml to simulate all of this...

[hugobuddel]

Now codecough is complaining, perhaps we should put a status also in tests/mocks/basic_instrument/default.yaml to simulate all of this...

I think we should indeed test this, otherwise it will bite us at some point. Or it is implicitly tested through the IRDB I guess right? (Maybe we should add coverage support to ScopeSim_Data?)

[astronomyk]

Verbally discussed. In Ordnung 👍