Skip to content
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
492 changes: 338 additions & 154 deletions .github/.copilot-instructions.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

723 changes: 723 additions & 0 deletions .github/copilot-instructions-architecture.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

514 changes: 514 additions & 0 deletions .github/copilot-instructions-security.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

586 changes: 586 additions & 0 deletions .github/copilot-instructions-testing.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

213 changes: 213 additions & 0 deletions COPILOT_INSTRUCTIONS_SUMMARY.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
# Code Review and Copilot Instructions Summary

This document summarizes the code review and the GitHub Copilot instruction files generated for the Confidential Disk Encryption Extension project.

## Overview

This is a **Rust-based** Azure VM extension that provides confidential disk encryption for both Linux (LUKS2) and Windows (BitLocker) VMs with TPM-sealed keys. The previous Copilot instructions were incorrectly referencing a Python project.

## System Design Review

### Architecture

The project follows a well-organized, modular architecture:

```
Extension Entry Point (main.rs)
Extension Handler (handler.rs) - Lifecycle management
┌───────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────┐
│ Prerequisites │ Disk Discovery │ Encryption │
│ (prereqs) │ (disk/mod) │ (platform) │
└───────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────┘
TPM Sealing
```

**Strengths:**
- ✅ Clear separation of concerns across modules
- ✅ Dependency injection via traits for testability
- ✅ Structured error handling with unique error codes (CDE###)
- ✅ Platform abstraction using conditional compilation
- ✅ Comprehensive test coverage (101 unit tests + 8 integration tests)
- ✅ Security-first design (zero-trust key management)

### Code Quality

**Current State:**
- Language: Rust 2021 edition
- MSRV: Rust 1.70+
- Test Coverage: ~109 tests (high coverage)
- CI/CD: Comprehensive GitHub Actions workflows
- Linting: Passes `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` with `-D warnings`

**Testing Strategy:**
- Unit tests colocated with source code (Rust best practice)
- Integration tests in `tests/` directory
- Uses `mockall` for mocking external dependencies
- Uses `rstest` for parameterized tests
- CI runs tests on both Linux and Windows

### Security Design

**Zero-Trust Key Management:**
1. Keys generated on-VM using OS CSPRNG (never transmitted)
2. Keys sealed to TPM immediately after use
3. No key escrow or external storage
4. Memory zeroed after key operations
5. No key material in logs or telemetry

**Threat Model Addressed:**
- ✅ Command injection prevention
- ✅ Key exfiltration prevention
- ✅ Information disclosure in errors
- ✅ TOCTOU race conditions
- ✅ Secure memory handling

## Generated Copilot Instructions

I've created **four comprehensive instruction files** for GitHub Copilot:

### 1. `.github/.copilot-instructions.md` (Main Instructions)

**Updated from Python to Rust** with sections on:
- Project context and VM requirements
- Rust edition and compatibility guidelines
- Testing requirements and patterns
- Mocking and dependency injection
- Error handling with structured codes
- Logging patterns with tracing
- Platform-specific code patterns
- Security guidelines
- Architecture patterns
- Code review checklist

**Key Updates:**
- Changed from Python 2.7/3.x to Rust 2021 edition
- Updated testing framework from unittest to Rust test framework
- Changed mocking from Python mock to mockall
- Updated command patterns from shell execution to Rust std::process
- Changed logging from Python logger to tracing crate

### 2. `.github/copilot-instructions-testing.md`

Comprehensive testing guidelines including:
- Test organization (colocated unit tests, integration tests)
- Naming conventions (`test_<function>_<scenario>`)
- Testing patterns (success/error/edge cases)
- Mocking with mockall (traits, expectations, verification)
- CLI testing with assert_cmd
- Temporary file handling with tempfile
- Test coverage requirements (80%+, 100% for critical paths)
- Running tests (cargo test, cargo nextest)
- Debugging techniques
- Anti-patterns to avoid

### 3. `.github/copilot-instructions-security.md`

Security-focused guidelines covering:
- Zero-trust key management principles
- Secure key generation (CSPRNG)
- Key storage and lifecycle
- Secure command execution (preventing injection)
- Input validation and sanitization
- Safe logging and telemetry (no sensitive data)
- Memory security (zeroing sensitive data)
- Error handling (preventing information disclosure)
- TOCTOU prevention
- Cryptographic best practices (LUKS2, AES-256, Argon2)
- TPM security (PCR policies)
- Dependency security (cargo-audit)
- Security testing patterns
- Security review checklist

### 4. `.github/copilot-instructions-architecture.md`

Architecture and design patterns including:
- High-level system architecture diagram
- Module organization and responsibilities
- Design principles (separation of concerns, DI, type safety)
- Dependency injection via traits
- Structured error handling patterns
- Type safety with newtypes
- Platform abstraction patterns
- Extension lifecycle state machine
- Data flow patterns (disk discovery, encryption)
- Error handling and recovery patterns
- Logging patterns (structured logging, hierarchical spans)
- Testing patterns (fixtures, mocks)
- Configuration patterns (builder pattern)
- Performance considerations
- Documentation patterns

## Code Quality Improvements Made

During the review and validation process, I fixed several issues:

1. **Formatting**: Applied `cargo fmt` to ensure consistent code style
2. **Linting**: Fixed clippy warnings:
- Changed `std::io::Error::new(ErrorKind::Other, ...)` to `std::io::Error::other(...)`
- Simplified redundant closures in error handling
- Addressed deprecated function warning with `#[allow(deprecated)]`

## Validation Results

✅ **All checks passed:**
- `cargo fmt --check` - Code formatting is consistent
- `cargo clippy -- -D warnings` - No linting warnings
- `cargo test` - All 109 tests passing
- Project builds successfully on the current platform

## Recommendations

### For Development

1. **Use the instruction files**: The new Copilot instructions are comprehensive and should guide all development
2. **Follow testing patterns**: Maintain high test coverage (currently at ~109 tests)
3. **Security first**: Always consider security implications, especially for key management
4. **Platform testing**: Test on both Linux and Windows before merging
5. **Keep dependencies updated**: Run `cargo audit` regularly

### For CI/CD

The existing CI pipeline is excellent:
- Tests on both Windows and Linux
- Linting (clippy) with `-D warnings`
- Format checking
- Documentation building
- Dry-run validation

### For Documentation

Consider adding:
- Code review checklist based on the instruction files
- Security audit process documentation
- Contribution guidelines referencing the Copilot instructions

## File Structure

```
.github/
├── .copilot-instructions.md # Main instructions (UPDATED)
├── copilot-instructions-testing.md # Testing patterns (NEW)
├── copilot-instructions-security.md # Security guidelines (NEW)
└── copilot-instructions-architecture.md # Architecture patterns (NEW)
```

## Summary

The Confidential Disk Encryption Extension is a well-designed, security-focused Rust project with:
- ✅ Clean architecture with clear separation of concerns
- ✅ Comprehensive testing (109 tests, high coverage)
- ✅ Security-first design (zero-trust key management)
- ✅ Good code quality (passes formatting and linting)
- ✅ Cross-platform support (Linux and Windows)

The new Copilot instruction files provide comprehensive guidance for:
- ✅ Rust development patterns and conventions
- ✅ Testing strategies and best practices
- ✅ Security-focused development
- ✅ Architecture patterns and design principles

These instructions will help maintain code quality and consistency as the project evolves.
60 changes: 34 additions & 26 deletions src/disk/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
//! This module provides functionality for discovering and querying disk information
//! on both Linux and Windows platforms.

use sysinfo::Disks;
use std::path::PathBuf;
use sysinfo::Disks;

/// Information about a single disk.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -95,24 +95,28 @@ impl std::fmt::Display for DiskType {
/// ```
pub fn discover_disks() -> Vec<DiskInfo> {
let disks = Disks::new_with_refreshed_list();

disks.list().iter().map(|disk| {
let disk_type = match disk.kind() {
sysinfo::DiskKind::SSD => DiskType::SSD,
sysinfo::DiskKind::HDD => DiskType::HDD,
_ => DiskType::Unknown,
};

DiskInfo {
name: disk.name().to_string_lossy().to_string(),
mount_point: disk.mount_point().to_path_buf(),
file_system: disk.file_system().to_string_lossy().to_string(),
disk_type,
total_space: disk.total_space(),
available_space: disk.available_space(),
is_removable: disk.is_removable(),
}
}).collect()
disks
.list()
.iter()
.map(|disk| {
let disk_type = match disk.kind() {
sysinfo::DiskKind::SSD => DiskType::SSD,
sysinfo::DiskKind::HDD => DiskType::HDD,
_ => DiskType::Unknown,
};

DiskInfo {
name: disk.name().to_string_lossy().to_string(),
mount_point: disk.mount_point().to_path_buf(),
file_system: disk.file_system().to_string_lossy().to_string(),
disk_type,
total_space: disk.total_space(),
available_space: disk.available_space(),
is_removable: disk.is_removable(),
}
})
.collect()
}

/// Prints disk information to stdout in a formatted manner.
Expand All @@ -133,7 +137,11 @@ pub fn print_disk_info(disks: &[DiskInfo]) {
println!(" Type: {}", disk.disk_type);
println!(" Total Space: {:.2} GB", disk.total_space_gb());
println!(" Available: {:.2} GB", disk.available_space_gb());
println!(" Used: {:.2} GB ({:.1}%)", disk.used_space_gb(), disk.usage_percent());
println!(
" Used: {:.2} GB ({:.1}%)",
disk.used_space_gb(),
disk.usage_percent()
);
println!(" Removable: {}", disk.is_removable);
println!();
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -169,7 +177,7 @@ mod tests {
#[test]
fn test_disk_info_zero_space() {
let disk = create_test_disk(0, 0);

assert_eq!(disk.used_space(), 0);
assert_eq!(disk.usage_percent(), 0.0);
assert_eq!(disk.total_space_gb(), 0.0);
Expand All @@ -178,15 +186,15 @@ mod tests {
#[test]
fn test_disk_info_full_disk() {
let disk = create_test_disk(1_073_741_824, 0); // Full disk

assert_eq!(disk.used_space(), 1_073_741_824);
assert!((disk.usage_percent() - 100.0).abs() < 0.01);
}

#[test]
fn test_disk_info_empty_disk() {
let disk = create_test_disk(1_073_741_824, 1_073_741_824); // Empty disk

assert_eq!(disk.used_space(), 0);
assert!((disk.usage_percent() - 0.0).abs() < 0.01);
}
Expand All @@ -195,7 +203,7 @@ mod tests {
fn test_disk_info_large_disk() {
// 1 TB disk
let disk = create_test_disk(1_099_511_627_776, 549_755_813_888);

assert!((disk.total_space_gb() - 1024.0).abs() < 0.01);
assert!((disk.available_space_gb() - 512.0).abs() < 0.01);
}
Expand All @@ -205,7 +213,7 @@ mod tests {
// Edge case: available > total (shouldn't happen, but test saturating behavior)
let mut disk = create_test_disk(100, 200);
disk.available_space = 200; // Manually set to test saturating_sub

assert_eq!(disk.used_space(), 0); // Should not underflow
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -234,7 +242,7 @@ mod tests {
fn test_disk_info_clone() {
let disk = create_test_disk(1024, 512);
let cloned = disk.clone();

assert_eq!(disk.name, cloned.name);
assert_eq!(disk.total_space, cloned.total_space);
}
Expand All @@ -243,7 +251,7 @@ mod tests {
fn test_disk_info_debug() {
let disk = create_test_disk(1024, 512);
let debug = format!("{:?}", disk);

assert!(debug.contains("DiskInfo"));
assert!(debug.contains("test"));
}
Expand Down
Loading