feat: mime npm package #34
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses several updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on the transition from the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
15-16: Fix markdown style: Remove blank line in blockquote.The documentation update clearly explains the package transition. However, there's a minor markdown style issue.
Apply this change:
-> Starting with version v1.6.0, mime npm package is used instead of mime-types (application/javascript -> text/javascript) - -> Starting with version v1.5.0, PsychicHttp v2 is also supported. +> Starting with version v1.6.0, mime npm package is used instead of mime-types (application/javascript -> text/javascript) +> Starting with version v1.5.0, PsychicHttp v2 is also supported.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
16-16: null
Blank line inside blockquote(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/ci-dev.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/ci-full.yaml(2 hunks)CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)src/index.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md
16-16: null
Blank line inside blockquote
(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci-full.yaml (1)
17-17:
Critical: Reconsider Node.js 22.x for release pipeline
Using Node.js 22.x (unstable) in a release pipeline that publishes to NPM is risky:
- Unstable versions may have breaking changes
- Build artifacts might differ between stable and unstable versions
- NPM publishing should use LTS versions for reliability
Recommend using the latest LTS version (20.x) for the release pipeline to ensure stable builds and deployments.
Also applies to: 50-50
package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump and dependency changes look good.
The version bump to 1.6.0 follows semver correctly for a new feature. The transition from mime-types to mime package is properly reflected in the dependencies.
Also applies to: 73-73
src/index.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM! Clean transition to mime package with improved variable naming.
The changes correctly implement the new mime package's API while improving code clarity by:
- Using
mime.getType()instead oflookup() - Renaming the variable from
mimetomimeTypeto avoid shadowing
Also applies to: 34-34, 59-59, 75-75
README.md (1)
Line range hint 73-73: Verify mime package version for security.
Let's check for any security advisories for the mime package version 4.0.4.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual version of mime being used in the project.
The mime package version 4.0.4 is secure
The project uses mime ^4.0.4 which is not affected by any known security vulnerabilities. The only reported vulnerabilities were in versions < 1.4.1 and between 2.0.0 and 2.0.3, both related to ReDoS attacks. These were patched in versions 1.4.1 and 2.0.3 respectively. Version 4.0.4 is well beyond these vulnerable versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories for mime package
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "mime") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 856
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for mime package version in package.json files
fd package.json --exec cat {} | jq 'if .dependencies.mime then .dependencies.mime else empty end, if .devDependencies.mime then .devDependencies.mime else empty end'
Length of output: 178
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
16-16: null
Blank line inside blockquote
(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
18-18: null
Blank line inside blockquote
(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-dev.yaml (1)
24-31: Well-structured step separation with clear namingGood practices observed:
- Using
npm ciinstead ofnpm install- Separate steps for different checks
- Clear step naming
Consider adding
continue-on-error: trueto the format and lint checks if you want to collect all issues rather than failing fast:- name: Run Format Check continue-on-error: true run: npm run format:check
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/ci-dev.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/ci-full.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci-dev.yaml (3)
10-14: Matrix strategy improvement noted, but unstable Node.js version concerns remain
The addition of a matrix strategy to test across multiple Node.js versions is a good practice. However, as previously noted, Node.js 22.x is currently unstable.
Consider either:
- Using only LTS versions:
[20.x, 18.x] - Adding a comment explaining the intentional inclusion of 22.x for early compatibility testing
18-23: LGTM! Good use of caching and latest action version
The setup is well-configured with:
- Latest setup-node action version
- Proper matrix version reference
- NPM cache for improved performance
33-34: LGTM! Clear step naming
The build step is well-named for better workflow readability.
.github/workflows/ci-full.yaml (1)
10-34: Changes mirror ci-dev.yaml improvements
The changes maintain consistency with ci-dev.yaml, which is good practice. The same considerations about Node.js versions and step structure apply.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
mime-typeswith themimenpm package for improved MIME type handling.Documentation
svelteesp32package.Bug Fixes
text/javascript.Workflow Enhancements