Skip to content

SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade org.glassfish.jersey.connectors:jersey-apache-connector from 2.37 to 3.0.17#346

Closed
bwappsec wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-312edc6a4da2505797c19ed5019b1230
Closed

SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade org.glassfish.jersey.connectors:jersey-apache-connector from 2.37 to 3.0.17#346
bwappsec wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-312edc6a4da2505797c19ed5019b1230

Conversation

@bwappsec
Copy link

@bwappsec bwappsec commented Jan 9, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • samples/client/petstore/java/jersey2-java8/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
low severity Information Exposure
SNYK-JAVA-COMMONSCODEC-561518
  67   org.glassfish.jersey.connectors:jersey-apache-connector:
2.37 -> 3.0.17
Major version upgrade Reachable No Known Exploit

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@bwappsec bwappsec changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade org.glassfish.jersey.connectors:jersey-apache-connector from 2.37 to 3.0.17 SWI-3723 [Snyk] Security upgrade org.glassfish.jersey.connectors:jersey-apache-connector from 2.37 to 3.0.17 Jan 9, 2025
@jgutierrezglez jgutierrezglez deleted the snyk-fix-312edc6a4da2505797c19ed5019b1230 branch October 1, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants