fix: support arrow functions in OpenAPI generator #1058
                
     Merged
            
            
          
      
        
          +102
        
        
          −1
        
        
          
        
      
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Ticket: DX-1799
Problem
The generator couldn't resolve
CallExpressionswhere the callee is an arrow function. When it looked upBooleanFromNullableWithFallbackand found an arrow function, it had no logic to parse the function body to extract the codec it returns, falling back to an empty schema.Example of the issue can be found in the ticket description.
Fix:
parseFunctionBody()to extract and parse arrow function return valuesCallExpressioncallees resolve to arrow functionsfindSymbolInitializer()for cross-file lookup of imported functionsexpression body (() => expr)Validation:
Test covers the bug scenario: calling an arrow function
BooleanFromNullableWithFallback()within a codec property definition.Note:
Block statement arrow functions were not part of the bug, but its valid TypeScript that the parser is not supporting.
An example of one is:
block statement (() => { return expr }).I added that in the error message and have created a new ticket DX-2182 to address this.