Initialize worka for sifb history

[NickSzapiro-NOAA]

For detailed information about submitting Pull Requests (PRs) to the CICE-Consortium,
please refer to: https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/About-Us/wiki/Resource-Index#information-for-developers

PR checklist

• Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
  Minor bug fix to initialize worka=0 for sifb history
• Developer(s):
  Nick Szapiro
• Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
  I don't have permissions to do this (?)
• Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
  ufs-weather-model regression testing
• How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
  • bit for bit, for all variables except sifb history
  • different at roundoff level
  • more substantial bug fixes for sifb history
• Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?
  • Yes
  • No
• Does this PR update the Icepack submodule? If so, the Icepack submodule must point to a hash on Icepack's main branch.
  • Yes
  • No
• Does this PR add any new test cases?
  • Yes
  • No
• Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)
  • Yes
  • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
    • Yes
    • No
• Please document the changes in detail, including why the changes are made. This will become part of the PR commit log.
  Minor fix to initialize worka=0 for sifb history variable accumulation (like elsewhere in ice_history) so don't have uninitialized values being accumulated. This is needed to fix out-of-range history values for sifb (in UFS)

[NickSzapiro-NOAA]

Some freeboards in ufs-weather-model regression tests were huge (like 10^3 to 10^6) and fixed with this

[dabail10]

Nice catch!