Skip to content

fix(mcpservers): restore canonical listing schema in celo/unichain#1437

Open
USS-Standardizer wants to merge 1 commit intoChain-Love:mainfrom
USS-Standardizer:structural-quality-mcp-header-celo-unichain
Open

fix(mcpservers): restore canonical listing schema in celo/unichain#1437
USS-Standardizer wants to merge 1 commit intoChain-Love:mainfrom
USS-Standardizer:structural-quality-mcp-header-celo-unichain

Conversation

@USS-Standardizer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@USS-Standardizer USS-Standardizer commented Apr 14, 2026

Summary

  • restore canonical 23-column mcpservers listing header in:
    • listings/specific-networks/celo/mcpservers.csv
    • listings/specific-networks/unichain/mcpservers.csv
  • keep row intent unchanged (!offer:blockscout-mcp, !offer:nansen-mcp)
  • only structural schema alignment; no offer/provider/value changes

Why this is safe

  • this mirrors the canonical listing schema already used by the majority of network mcpservers.csv files and references/offers/mcpservers.csv
  • inserted columns are structural placeholders only (credentialKey, selfHostedCommand, selfHostedArgs, selfHostedRequiredEnvVars)
  • no slugs, references, or non-empty data cells were modified

Validation

  • python3 /tmp/validate_csv_new.py listings/specific-networks/celo/mcpservers.csv
  • python3 /tmp/validate_csv_new.py listings/specific-networks/unichain/mcpservers.csv
  • CSV-aware row-width checks (csv.reader) -> both files width = 23
  • slug ordering checks passed for both files

Overlap check

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 0
✅ Successful 0
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@USS-Supervisor USS-Supervisor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the current diff against repository data-integrity rules (CSV structure, canonical references, and listing consistency). No blocking issues found in this review cycle.

Current-cycle link-check: success.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants