type error fixed for Navbarlink2 #537
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new generic type, Changes
Poem
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/simulator/src/data.ts (1)
29-49: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Verify function return types match LogixFunction.
All assigned functions should return either
voidorPromise<void>to match theLogixFunctiontype definition. While the type conversion looks correct, consider adding return type annotations to the imported functions to ensure type safety.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify return types of functions assigned to logixFunction # Check function imports to verify return types echo "Checking return types of functions assigned to logixFunction:" # Sample check for a few functions rg -A 3 "function save\(" src/simulator/src/data rg -A 3 "function load\(" src/simulator/src/data rg -A 3 "function createSaveAsImgPrompt\(" src/simulator/src/dataLength of output: 1179
Action: Add Explicit Return Type Annotations
The functions assigned to
logixFunctionshould explicitly annotate their return types asvoidorPromise<void>to fully comply with theLogixFunctiontype definition. Our checks for functions likesave(which is async),load, andcreateSaveAsImgPromptindicate they lack explicit return type annotations. For improved type safety and consistency across the codebase, please update the following:
src/simulator/src/data/save.js
Change from:export default async function save() { // ... }To:
export default async function save(): Promise<void> { // ... }src/simulator/src/data/load.js
Change from:export default function load(data) { // ... }To:
export default function load(data): void { // ... }src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.js (for
createSaveAsImgPrompt)
Change from:export default function createSaveAsImgPrompt(scope = globalScope) { // ... }To:
export default function createSaveAsImgPrompt(scope = globalScope): void { // ... }Please verify similar changes for the remaining functions assigned to
logixFunctionto ensure full type conformity.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/simulator/src/data.ts (1)
24-28: Consider adding documentation comments.While the type definitions are clear, adding TSDoc comments would further enhance the readability and maintainability of the code. This would help other developers understand the purpose and usage of these types.
+/** + * Represents a function that can be stored in logixFunction. + * @template T - Array type for the function arguments + * @param args - Any number of arguments of various types + * @returns void or Promise<void> + */ type LogixFunction<T extends any[] = any[]> = (...args: T) => void | Promise<void>; +/** + * Collection of simulator functions that can be accessed by name. + * Used to store and access various utility functions across the simulator. + */ const logixFunction : Record<string, LogixFunction> = {}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/data.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/simulator/src/data.ts (2)
25-25: Good use of a flexible generic type definition.The
LogixFunctiontype definition is well-designed, allowing for variable arguments while maintaining a clear return type of eithervoidorPromise<void>. This provides flexibility for the various function implementations that will be stored in the logixFunction object.
27-27: Good type safety improvement using Record.Using
Record<string, LogixFunction>provides strong typing for thelogixFunctionobject while maintaining its flexibility as a collection of related functions. This addresses the issue mentioned in PR #535 and improves type safety throughout the codebase.
|
|
||
| type LogixFunction<T extends any[] = any[]> = (...args: T) => void | Promise<void>; | ||
|
|
||
| const logixFunction : Record<string, LogixFunction> = {} | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
using any does not solve type safety
Fixes #535
Describe the changes you have made in this PR -
converted data.js to data.ts and gave the type to the logixFunction, which is an object used Record API in which key is string and value is function which can take as many att required of any type for much Flexibility and returns void or Promise
Screenshots of the changes (If any) -
before changes
after changes
Note: Please check Allow edits from maintainers. if you would like us to assist in the PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit