provided types to the funtion #542
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes modify explicit type declarations and function parameters in the CombinationalAnalysis component. Three reactive references now include specific TypeScript types: one as an array of numbers and two as arrays of strings (with one using an alternate syntax). Additionally, the Changes
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (2)
41-43: Type annotations improve code clarity and safetyAdding TypeScript type annotations to the reactive references is a good improvement that enhances type safety and makes the code more maintainable. However, there's an inconsistency in how the types are annotated:
- Lines 41-42 use the recommended syntax:
ref<type>([])- Line 43 uses a less common syntax:
ref(<string []>[])For better consistency, consider updating line 43 to match the style of the other refs:
-const outputListNames = ref(<string []>[]) +const outputListNames = ref<string[]>([])
217-217: Function parameter types improve code safetyAdding types to function parameters is beneficial for catching type errors early. However, there are spacing inconsistencies in the type declarations.
For better readability and consistent style, adjust the spacing around the type annotations:
-function createBooleanPrompt(inputList : string[] , outputList :string[], scope = globalScope) { +function createBooleanPrompt(inputList: string[], outputList: string[], scope = globalScope) {Additionally, consider adding a type annotation for the
scopeparameter to complete the function signature.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (1)
219-221: Optional chaining improves error handlingThe addition of optional chaining (
?.) for the prompt method calls is an excellent improvement that prevents potential runtime errors if a user cancels the prompt (which returns null) and then tries to callsplit()on that null value.
|
@malviya-rajveer |
|
@ThatDeparted2061 comment that PR please in which it was resolved so that mentors can view that as well.Thank you!! |
Fixes #414
Describe the changes you have made in this PR -
gave types to the parameter. Added optional chaining to prompt and give types to inputListNames and outputListNames
Screenshots of the changes (If any) -
before
After
Note: Please check Allow edits from maintainers. if you would like us to assist in the PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit