added verilog module for LSB #621
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes correct a property typo in the LSB module, remove the existing Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm error Exit handler never called! ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#593
File: v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js:191-192
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:55:53.137Z
Learning: The ALU Verilog module in v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js currently only supports 1-bit processing. Width parameter support will be added in the future for scalability, even though the JavaScript ALU implementation already supports variable bit widths.
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#591
File: v1/src/simulator/src/sequential/JKflipFlop.js:159-188
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:26:38.102Z
Learning: In the CircuitVerse project, Verilog modules for circuit elements like JKflipFlop are designed to be consistent with the circuit simulation design, which means reset and preset signals are implemented synchronously (triggered on clock edge) rather than asynchronously, even when the signals are named as asynchronous reset/preset.
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js (2)
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#593
File: v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js:191-192
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:55:53.137Z
Learning: The ALU Verilog module in v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js currently only supports 1-bit processing. Width parameter support will be added in the future for scalability, even though the JavaScript ALU implementation already supports variable bit widths.
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#591
File: v1/src/simulator/src/sequential/JKflipFlop.js:159-188
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:26:38.102Z
Learning: In the CircuitVerse project, Verilog modules for circuit elements like JKflipFlop are designed to be consistent with the circuit simulation design, which means reset and preset signals are implemented synchronously (triggered on clock edge) rather than asynchronously, even when the signals are named as asynchronous reset/preset.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js (1)
27-27: LGTM: Typo correction.Good fix for the property name from
intputSizetoinputSize.
| static moduleVerilog() { | ||
| return ` | ||
| module LSB(out, en, inp); | ||
| parameter WIDTH = 1; | ||
| output reg [WIDTH-1:0] out; | ||
| output reg en; | ||
| input [WIDTH-1:0] inp; | ||
|
|
||
| integer i; | ||
|
|
||
| always @(*) begin | ||
| out = 0; | ||
| en = 0; | ||
| for (i = WIDTH-1; i >=0; i = i - 1) begin | ||
| if (inp[i]) begin | ||
| out = WIDTH-1-i; | ||
| en = 1; | ||
| break; | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| endmodule` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical logic error: Verilog implementation finds MSB instead of LSB.
The Verilog implementation has two critical issues:
-
Logic Error: The for-loop iterates from MSB to LSB (
WIDTH-1down to0), which finds the Most Significant Bit, not the Least Significant Bit. This contradicts the JavaScript implementation that correctly finds the LSB. -
Synthesis Issue: The
breakstatement is not synthesizable in Verilog and will cause synthesis failures.
Apply this diff to fix both issues:
- always @(*) begin
- out = 0;
- en = 0;
- for (i = WIDTH-1; i >=0; i = i - 1) begin
- if (inp[i]) begin
- out = WIDTH-1-i;
- en = 1;
- break;
- end
- end
- end
+ always @(*) begin
+ out = 0;
+ en = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < WIDTH; i = i + 1) begin
+ if (inp[i]) begin
+ out = i;
+ en = 1;
+ i = WIDTH; // Exit loop (synthesizable alternative to break)
+ end
+ end
+ endThis ensures the module correctly finds the least significant set bit and uses synthesizable Verilog constructs.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js lines 124 to 146, the Verilog code
incorrectly searches from MSB to LSB, finding the most significant set bit
instead of the least significant one, and uses a non-synthesizable break
statement. To fix this, reverse the for-loop to iterate from 0 up to WIDTH-1 to
find the least significant set bit, and replace the break statement with a
synthesizable control structure such as a flag or conditional to exit the loop
properly without using break.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@niladrix719, I'll resolve this issue by fixing the Verilog implementation to correctly find the LSB and use synthesizable code.
Task: Fix LSB Verilog Implementation
- Fix the for-loop direction to iterate from LSB to MSB (0 to WIDTH-1)
- Replace non-synthesizable
breakstatement with synthesizable loop control - Ensure the output correctly represents the LSB position
The fix addresses both critical issues:
- Logic Error: Changed the loop to iterate from 0 to WIDTH-1 (
i = 0; i < WIDTH; i = i + 1) to find the LSB correctly - Synthesis Issue: Replaced the non-synthesizable
breakstatement withi = WIDTHto exit the loop in a synthesizable way
This ensures the module correctly finds the least significant set bit position and can be synthesized properly.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#593
File: v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js:191-192
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:55:53.137Z
Learning: The ALU Verilog module in v1/src/simulator/src/modules/ALU.js currently only supports 1-bit processing. Width parameter support will be added in the future for scalability, even though the JavaScript ALU implementation already supports variable bit widths.
Learnt from: 092vk
PR: CircuitVerse/cv-frontend-vue#591
File: v1/src/simulator/src/sequential/JKflipFlop.js:159-188
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:26:38.102Z
Learning: In the CircuitVerse project, Verilog modules for circuit elements like JKflipFlop are designed to be consistent with the circuit simulation design, which means reset and preset signals are implemented synchronously (triggered on clock edge) rather than asynchronously, even when the signals are named as asynchronous reset/preset.
⏳ Preparing changes...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A summary of the changes CodeRabbit can apply:
- Correct the LSB.js Verilog module by changing the loop to count from LSB to MSB, output the index directly, and replace the non-synthesizable break statement with a synthesizable loop exit to fix the logic and ensure proper hardware synthesis.
A summary of the context that CodeRabbit is considering across the codebase:
I need to understand how the JavaScript implementation works to ensure the Verilog fix is consistent with the expected behavior.
Show context details
Generated Script:
```shell
grep -n -A 20 "resolve()" src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js
**Shell Result:**
67: resolve() {
68- const inp = dec2bin(this.inp1.value)
69- let out = 0
70- for (let i = inp.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
71- if (inp[i] === '1') {
72- out = inp.length - 1 - i
73- break
74- }
75- }
76- this.output1.value = out
77- simulationArea.simulationQueue.add(this.output1)
78- if (inp != 0) {
79- this.enable.value = 1
80- } else {
81- this.enable.value = 0
82- }
83- simulationArea.simulationQueue.add(this.enable)
84- }
</details>
> <rationale>Let me verify the current Verilog implementation structure to ensure my fix targets the correct lines.</rationale>
<details>
<summary>Show context details</summary>
**Generated Script:**
grep -n -A 15 "static moduleVerilog" src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js
**Shell Result:**
124: static moduleVerilog() {
125- return 126- module LSB(out, en, inp); 127- parameter WIDTH = 1; 128- output reg [WIDTH-1:0] out; 129- output reg en; 130- input [WIDTH-1:0] inp; 131- 132- integer i; 133- 134- always @(*) begin 135- out = 0; 136- en = 0; 137- for (i = WIDTH-1; i >=0; i = i - 1) begin 138- if (inp[i]) begin 139- out = WIDTH-1-i; 140- en = 1; 141- break; 142- end 143- end 144- end 145- endmodule
146- }
</details>
> <rationale>I should check if there are any other Verilog modules that use similar loop patterns to understand the synthesizable coding style used in this project.</rationale>
<details>
<summary>Show context details</summary>
**Generated Script:**
rg -A 15 -B 5 "for.*i.*WIDTH" src/simulator/src/modules/
**Shell Result:**
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- integer i;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js-
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- always @(*) begin
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- out = 0;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- en = 0;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js: for (i = WIDTH-1; i >=0; i = i - 1) begin
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- if (inp[i]) begin
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- out = WIDTH-1-i;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- en = 1;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- break;
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- end
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- end
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- end
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- endmodule`
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- }
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js-}
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js-
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js-/**
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- * @memberof LSB
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- * Help Tip
src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js- * @type {string}
</details>
- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "32599f3c-a2a5-4bb9-b887-dee90db62b97", "radioGroupId": "edit-actions-group-2185921526"} --> ✅ Create PR with these edits
- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "85e7c9f1-3a23-4b8e-9f25-d7a5b234a8c1", "radioGroupId": "edit-actions-group-2185921526"} --> 📌 Create commit in current branch
- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "6b3df8e2-79f5-4eb8-9d4a-c7d3a6a5f7b1", "radioGroupId": "edit-actions-group-2185921526"} --> 📋 Get copyable edits
<!-- <agentComponentType>plan-edits</agentComponentType> -->
<!-- <rawResChunk>Looking at the LSB module, I can see the critical issues mentioned in the user's request. The Verilog implementation has a logic error where it searches from MSB to LSB instead of LSB to MSB, and uses a non-synthesizable `break` statement.
<context>
<rationale>I need to understand how the JavaScript implementation works to ensure the Verilog fix is consistent with the expected behavior.</rationale>
<generated_script>
```shell
grep -n -A 20 "resolve()" src/simulator/src/modules/LSB.js
</generated_script>
<shell_result>
67: resolve() {
68- const inp = dec2bin(this.inp1.value)
69- let out = 0
70- for (let i = inp.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
71- if (inp[i] === '1') {
72- out = inp.length - 1 - i
73- break
74- }
75- }
76- this.output1.value = out
77- simulationArea.simulationQueue.add(this.output1)
78- if (inp != 0) {
79- this.enable.value = 1
80- } else {
81- this.enable.value = 0
82- }
83- simulationArea.simulationQueue.add(this.enable)
84- }
</shell_result>
Now I understand the issue completely. The JavaScript implementation correctly finds the LSB by iterating from MSB to LSB and calculating the position as inp.length - 1 - i, but the Verilog implementation incorrectly mimics this approach without accounting for the different indexing logic needed in Verilog.
The fix should:
- Change the loop to iterate from 0 to WIDTH-1 to find the LSB directly
- Output the index
idirectly instead of calculatingWIDTH-1-i - Replace the non-synthesizable
breakwithi = WIDTHto exit the loop
| static moduleVerilog() { | ||
| return ` | ||
| module LSB(out, en, inp); | ||
| parameter WIDTH = 1; | ||
| output reg [WIDTH-1:0] out; | ||
| output reg en; | ||
| input [WIDTH-1:0] inp; | ||
|
|
||
| integer i; | ||
|
|
||
| always @(*) begin | ||
| out = 0; | ||
| en = 0; | ||
| for (i = WIDTH-1; i >=0; i = i - 1) begin | ||
| if (inp[i]) begin | ||
| out = WIDTH-1-i; | ||
| en = 1; | ||
| break; | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| endmodule` | ||
| } |
Fixes #560
Describe the changes you have made in this PR -
Note: Please check Allow edits from maintainers. if you would like us to assist in the PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features