Skip to content

Conversation

@nishant-clevertap
Copy link
Contributor

@nishant-clevertap nishant-clevertap commented Sep 18, 2025

  • When we add other library using SDWebImage like SDWebImageSwiftUI and SDWebImageWebPCoder, we get conflict while adding our SDK via SPM - multiple packages declare targets with a conflicting name: 'SDWebImage'; target names need to be unique across the package graph.
  • To fix this added SDWebImage library with a different name SDWebImageCT as binary target and do not linked the framework.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • ^(task|feat|feature|fix)/

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bug/SDK-5187/spm_fix

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@francispereira
Copy link

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

code/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@nishant-clevertap nishant-clevertap marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2025 06:54
@nishant-clevertap nishant-clevertap self-assigned this Sep 18, 2025
@akashvercetti akashvercetti merged commit e09f80c into develop Oct 29, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants