Skip to content

London | Nadarajah_Sripathmanathan | Sprint-1/Array Destructuring | Module-Data-Flows #192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sripathman
Copy link

Learners, PR Template

Self checklist

  • I have committed my files one by one, on purpose, and for a reason
  • I have titled my PR with COHORT_NAME | FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME | REPO_NAME | WEEK
  • I have tested my changes
  • My changes follow the style guide
  • My changes meet the requirements of this task

Changelist

Briefly explain your PR.

Questions

Ask any questions you have for your reviewer.

@sripathman
Copy link
Author

good morning ,I have done Module-Data-Flows sprint-1 , Could you review please

@sripathman sripathman added the Needs Review Participant to add when requesting review label Apr 11, 2025
@jenny-alexander
Copy link

Hi @sripathman - can you review the files you've included in your PR? Right now, it shows you are only removing files.
Screenshot 2025-04-20 at 8 23 21 PM

➡️ The PR should have the exercise.js files only from the sprint-1/destructing directory. Something similar to this:
Screenshot 2025-04-20 at 8 25 41 PM

@cjyuan cjyuan added the 👀 Review Git Changes requested to do with Git label Apr 21, 2025
@illicitonion illicitonion removed the Needs Review Participant to add when requesting review label May 21, 2025
@illicitonion
Copy link
Member

Removing "Needs Review" from this PR - please fix up the files and re-add the label if you want it to be reviewed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
👀 Review Git Changes requested to do with Git
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants