Skip to content

refactor: direct constants import #12973

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025
Merged

refactor: direct constants import #12973

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

P403n1x87
Copy link
Contributor

@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 commented Mar 31, 2025

We refactor some imports from ddtrace.constants to import the module directly instead of grabbing it from ddtrace. This removes some circular import paths from static code analysis.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

We refactor some imports from ddtrace.constants to import the module
directly instead of grabbing it from ddtrace. This removes some circular
import paths from static code analysis.
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2025 12:11
Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/appsec/_api_security/api_manager.py                             @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_trace_utils.py                                          @DataDog/asm-python

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Bootstrap import analysis

Comparison of import times between this PR and base.

Summary

The average import time from this PR is: 228 ± 2 ms.

The average import time from base is: 231 ± 2 ms.

The import time difference between this PR and base is: -2.41 ± 0.09 ms.

Import time breakdown

The following import paths have shrunk:

ddtrace.auto 1.985 ms (0.87%)
ddtrace.bootstrap.sitecustomize 1.307 ms (0.57%)
ddtrace.bootstrap.preload 1.307 ms (0.57%)
ddtrace.internal.products 1.307 ms (0.57%)
ddtrace.internal.remoteconfig.client 0.630 ms (0.28%)
ddtrace 0.678 ms (0.30%)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-04-01 12:43:07

Comparing candidate commit 8b559e2 in PR branch refactor/constants-import with baseline commit 294ea72 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 498 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@christophe-papazian christophe-papazian added changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. ASM Application Security Monitoring labels Apr 1, 2025
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 merged commit 0308e1c into main Apr 1, 2025
468 of 470 checks passed
@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 deleted the refactor/constants-import branch April 1, 2025 14:03
chojomok pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
We refactor some imports from ddtrace.constants to import the module
directly instead of grabbing it from ddtrace. This removes some circular
import paths from static code analysis.

## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met 
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ASM Application Security Monitoring changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants