-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
ci: increase tracer suite parallelism to 14 #15329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
|
Bootstrap import analysisComparison of import times between this PR and base. SummaryThe average import time from this PR is: 250 ± 3 ms. The average import time from base is: 259 ± 3 ms. The import time difference between this PR and base is: -8.5 ± 0.1 ms. Import time breakdownThe following import paths have shrunk:
|
Performance SLOsComparing candidate brettlangdon/ci.tracer.parallelism (ead9528) with baseline main (2f7da21) 📈 Performance Regressions (1 suite)📈 iastaspectsospath - 24/24✅ ospathbasename_aspectTime: ✅ 4.268µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -57.3%) vs baseline: -1.0% Memory: ✅ 39.833MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ ospathbasename_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.085µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -89.1%) vs baseline: -1.3% Memory: ✅ 39.852MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathjoin_aspectTime: ✅ 6.204µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -38.0%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 39.990MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ ospathjoin_noaspectTime: ✅ 2.284µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -77.2%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathnormcase_aspectTime: ✅ 3.550µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -64.5%) vs baseline: +1.1% Memory: ✅ 39.774MB (SLO: <41.000MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.4% ✅ ospathnormcase_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.564µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -94.4%) vs baseline: -1.0% Memory: ✅ 39.793MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ ospathsplit_aspectTime: ✅ 4.944µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -50.6%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathsplit_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.598µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.0%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 39.833MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_aspectTime: ✅ 4.161µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -58.4%) vs baseline: 📈 +13.5% Memory: ✅ 39.852MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.697µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -93.0%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 39.951MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ ospathsplitext_aspectTime: ✅ 5.209µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -47.9%) vs baseline: 📈 +13.3% Memory: ✅ 39.813MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ ospathsplitext_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.381µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.2%) vs baseline: -1.3% Memory: ✅ 39.931MB (SLO: <41.000MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +4.7% 🟡 Near SLO Breach (1 suite)🟡 telemetryaddmetric - 30/30✅ 1-count-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.930µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -85.3%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 1-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 196.668µs (SLO: <220.000µs 📉 -10.6%) vs baseline: -1.3% Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 1-distribution-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.311µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -83.4%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 216.672µs (SLO: <220.000µs 🟡 -1.5%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.603MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-gauge-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.171µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -89.1%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 136.802µs (SLO: <150.000µs -8.8%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-rate-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.137µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -84.3%) vs baseline: +2.4% Memory: ✅ 34.583MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ 1-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 211.688µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -15.3%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.603MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 100-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 19.834ms (SLO: <22.000ms -9.8%) vs baseline: -0.9% Memory: ✅ 34.505MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 100-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.256ms (SLO: <2.300ms 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 100-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 1.411ms (SLO: <1.550ms -9.0%) vs baseline: +0.8% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 100-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.197ms (SLO: <2.550ms 📉 -13.8%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 34.446MB (SLO: <35.500MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ flush-1-metricTime: ✅ 4.600µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -77.0%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ flush-100-metricsTime: ✅ 173.125µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -30.7%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 34.505MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ flush-1000-metricsTime: ✅ 2.129ms (SLO: <2.500ms 📉 -14.8%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 35.252MB (SLO: <36.500MB -3.4%) vs baseline: +4.6%
|
Description
We have 14 venvs, but only use 9 jobs, so some jobs are running multiple venvs, moving it to be 1:1 venv to job will help with runtime and avoid timeouts.
Testing
Risks
Additional Notes