Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first draft of Managing Account Theft with ASM #28505

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelcretzman
Copy link
Contributor

This guide covers:

  1. Collecting login information:
  • Enable and verify login activity collection in Datadog ASM using automatic or manual instrumentation methods.
  • Use remote configuration options if you cannot modify your service code.
  • Troubleshoot missing or incorrect data.
  1. Preparing for account takeover campaigns:
  • Prepare for ATO campaigns detected by ASM.
  • Configure notifications for attack alerts.
  • Validate proper data propagation for accurate attacker identification.
  • Set up automatic IP blocking for immediate mitigation.
  • Learn about the importance of temporary blocking due to dynamic attacker IPs.
  1. Reacting to account takeover campaigns:
  • Learn how to react to ATO campaigns, including attacker strategies, triage, response, investigation, monitoring, and cleanup.

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

@michaelcretzman michaelcretzman added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Apr 1, 2025
@michaelcretzman michaelcretzman self-assigned this Apr 1, 2025
@michaelcretzman michaelcretzman requested review from a team as code owners April 1, 2025 21:31
Copy link
Contributor

@Taiki-San Taiki-San left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comment on Phase 1. Mostly, I raise cases where the original meaning was lost in the edit

Copy link
Contributor

@Taiki-San Taiki-San left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phase 2

michaelcretzman and others added 3 commits April 3, 2025 13:23
Incorp peer edit review

Co-authored-by: DeForest Richards <[email protected]>
Incorp Dev review phase 1

Co-authored-by: Taiki <[email protected]>
@drichards-87 drichards-87 removed the request for review from a team April 3, 2025 22:17
Copy link
Contributor

@drichards-87 drichards-87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a couple of small comments and approved the PR.

michaelcretzman and others added 2 commits April 3, 2025 18:30
additional edits from peer reviewer

Co-authored-by: DeForest Richards <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Taiki <[email protected]>
they were lost when I used Visual Studio Code to manage them.
I went thru each one and did it manually in this commit.
Copy link
Contributor

@Taiki-San Taiki-San left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still need to finalize the Distributed Credential Stuffing and the Cleanup/Conclusion sections

michaelcretzman and others added 3 commits April 7, 2025 11:46
Committing some dev edits

Co-authored-by: Taiki <[email protected]>
Edited revision

Co-authored-by: Taiki <[email protected]>
last of dev edit

Co-authored-by: Taiki <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants