Skip to content

Added service naming caveat and image to Full Host profiling enabling page #30867

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brantigua
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Added service naming caveat and image to Full Host profiling enabling page

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@brantigua brantigua requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2025 20:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Images Images are added/removed with this PR label Aug 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

✅ Documentation Team Review

The documentation team has approved this pull request. Thank you for your contribution!

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@brett0000FF brett0000FF added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Aug 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@brett0000FF brett0000FF left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good! I mostly suggested tiny edits to link to the section from the callout and use present instead of future tense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review Images Images are added/removed with this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants