chore: untrack local specification records - #194
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
spec/development-record directory.specs/ignore rule and E2E exceptions.Cause
The ignore file covered plural
specs/, but the development policy and existing record use singularspec/. Commit c98c090 therefore addedspec/001-announce-new-issues-to-discord.mdas a tracked file because no matching ignore rule existed. Adding an ignore rule alone would not untrack an already indexed file, so this change also removes that file from the index.Empirical Verification (UTRs)
This PR changes only
.gitignoreand a development-only Markdown record; it does not change runtime code.