Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency pydantic to v2 #147

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 1, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pydantic (changelog) ==1.10.17 -> ==2.10.6 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pydantic/pydantic (pydantic)

v2.10.6

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Fixes

v2.10.5

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed

v2.10.4

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Packaging
Fixes
New Contributors

v2.10.3

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Fixes

v2.10.2

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Fixes

v2.10.1

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Packaging
Fixes
New Contributors

v2.10.0

Compare Source

The code released in v2.10.0 is practically identical to that of v2.10.0b2.

GitHub release

See the v2.10 release blog post for the highlights!

What's Changed
Packaging
New Features
Changes
Performance
Fixes
New Contributors

v2.9.2

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Fixes

v2.9.1

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed
Fixes

v2.9.0

Compare Source

GitHub release

The code released in v2.9.0 is practically identical to that of v2.9.0b2.

What's Changed
Packaging
New Features
Changes
Performance
Minor Internal Improvements
Fixes
New Contributors
pydantic

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-3 1 * *" in timezone Europe/London, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Feb 1, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: uv.lock
Command failed: uv lock --upgrade-package pydantic
Using CPython 3.12.8 interpreter at: /opt/containerbase/tools/python/3.12.8/bin/python3.12
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
  ╰─▶ Because your project depends on dc-response-builder and only
      dc-response-builder==1.0.0 is available, we can conclude that your
      project depends on dc-response-builder==1.0.0.
      And because dc-response-builder==1.0.0 depends on
      pydantic[email]>=1.10,<2 and ecpostcodelookuppages:dev depends
      on pydantic[email]==2.10.6, we can conclude that your project and
      ecpostcodelookuppages:dev are incompatible.
      And because your project requires your project and
      ecpostcodelookuppages:dev, we can conclude that your project's
      requirements are unsatisfiable.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants