-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
sima0_13_002: Refactor vertical coordinate computation in MPAS dynamical core #456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kuanchihwang
merged 10 commits into
ESCOMP:development
from
kuanchihwang:staging/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
Mar 27, 2026
+623
−26
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4927c13
Allow selective queries to mesh dimensions
kuanchihwang 1caa302
Limit longitude values within the range of [0, 2 * pi)
kuanchihwang 3236c7e
Implement standardized procedures for computing vertical coordinates
kuanchihwang bc29a54
Implement unit tests
kuanchihwang 4f13bac
Refactor reference height computation in terms of standardized proced…
kuanchihwang 6e6a07a
Merge branch 'development' into develop/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
kuanchihwang e275afb
Merge branch 'development' into develop/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
kuanchihwang 751cc4a
Merge branch 'development' into develop/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
kuanchihwang 35deeed
Merge branch 'development' into develop/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
kuanchihwang c736cec
Merge branch 'development' into develop/mpas-dycore-refactor-height
kuanchihwang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a nitpick but maybe the cumulative sum could be constructed through the loop instead of calling
sumfor eachksame for the
real64variant. I think either construction is clear in intent and the performance difference would be minimal, so please feel free to ignore this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The suggested form of loop introduces read-after-write (RAW) dependency, which prevents vectorization. Intel compiler gives the following remark:
However, I agree that the loop trip count is likely never large enough for this to matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for testing! Sounds good.