ctsm5.3.059: Various cleanup efforts from the cesm3_0_beta04 tags for testing and usability#2950
ctsm5.3.059: Various cleanup efforts from the cesm3_0_beta04 tags for testing and usability#2950
Conversation
…y fail as expected
…FATES, and also off when coupled to CAM
… initialization of the CNFireNorFire class
… initialization of the CNFireNorFire class
…file' into ne3np4_to_defaults_and_makefile
…efile slevis resolved conflicts: bld/unit_testers/build-namelist_test.pl
Bring back clm5-cam6 init_interp_attributes for ne0CONUS grid
…ts with 3d CAM using F2000climo with SROF
ctsm warm_start mods
…np4_to_defaults_and_makefile
…file ne3np4 to namelist_defaults_ctsm.xml and Makefile for PTS mode and add ability for warm starts in PTS mode
Fix PEM test for FATES testmod that builds an on-the-fly parameter file
|
I updated to ctsm5.3.057 and testing for aux_clm is passing as expected on Derecho and Izumi. |
branch with 5.3.05Y: Make sure FORTRAN code properly aborts when fire-emission is asked for and it can't be provided
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm reviewing the part of this that comes in with #2844 since the other PRs were mine.
The title of #2844 predisposed me to expect a short PR with few code changes. This turns out to be a major (in my perception) refactor, plus an addition of unit tests. Thank you for all this @ekluzek!
I included a few questions. Nothing stood out as problematic to me.
|
I ran some extra tests to make sure the issues were resolved. These PASS: PEA.1x1_smallvilleIA.IHistClm50BgcCropQianRs.derecho_gnu.clm-smallville_dynurban_monthly These fail and need to be figured out: ERS_Ld3.f19_f19_mg17.FXHIST.derecho_intel.cam-waccmx_weimer (SETUP) |
|
It looks like the problem with the f19 tests are the unusual RUN_STARTDATE of: 2005-12-31 and 2003-10-28. It fails with the problem we have been seeing where use_init_interp isn't coordinated correctly with the IC files. The ARCTIC grid fails in an ESMF regrid and I think it's likely due to too few processors. The default for CAM is 91 nodes, which is 11k tasks, so 10X larger than the tasks asked for. So I think it will likely work with more processors. |
|
Since, I had some variety of tests failing, I sent the ctsm_sci test list and these tests failed as they need the --clm-nofireemis added as an extra testmod to them. SMS_Ld5.f09_g17.IHistClm50SpCru.derecho_intel.clm-default (SETUP) |
|
In the meeting this morning, I was encouraged to make the tag as is. And file issues for anything outstanding. I have created baselines that just need to be renamed. And I'll start the ChangeLog. |
…s, adding SEQ and PEA tests, make sure the changes are for Clm60 tests
|
Some tests have different answers because the fieldlists change because fire-emission is off. ERP_D_Ld3_PS.f09_g17.I2000Clm50Sp.derecho_intel.clm-prescribed Also the ctsm_sci comparison to ctsm5.3.051 changes answers for VOC's because the MEGAN change came in just after that. |
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress - master
to Done (non release/external)
in CTSM: Upcoming tags
5 participants
Description of changes
Various updates for testing and other problems identified in the cesm3_0_beta04 tag. So fixes and cleanup for usability.
Including the following:
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @slevis-lmwg
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #2868
Fixes #2791
Fixes #2768
Fixes #2780
Fixes #2762
Fixes #3073
Some of #2810
CTSM namelist checking for: NGEET/fates#1356
Some work on #2643
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? Yes
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No
Testing performed, if any: regular
PR's Involved:
#2840
#2835
#2834
#2844