Skip to content

Conversation

gabedemesa
Copy link

@gabedemesa gabedemesa commented Sep 17, 2025

WIP I am still testing this

Basically the issue was in our .env we set

LOG_LEVEL=None

However Config.logLevel('LOG_LEVEL') results in a type error since None is not a valid label. It's supposed to be Off. So I am making a change to support both in a non breaking fashion to make it more intuitive and improve QoL.

Type

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update

Description

Related

  • Related Issue #
  • Closes #

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 17, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 0c51cbd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 35 packages
Name Type
effect Patch
@effect/cli Patch
@effect/cluster Patch
@effect/experimental Patch
@effect/opentelemetry Patch
@effect/platform-browser Patch
@effect/platform-bun Patch
@effect/platform-node-shared Patch
@effect/platform-node Patch
@effect/platform Patch
@effect/printer-ansi Patch
@effect/printer Patch
@effect/rpc Patch
@effect/sql-clickhouse Patch
@effect/sql-d1 Patch
@effect/sql-drizzle Patch
@effect/sql-kysely Patch
@effect/sql-libsql Patch
@effect/sql-mssql Patch
@effect/sql-mysql2 Patch
@effect/sql-pg Patch
@effect/sql-sqlite-bun Patch
@effect/sql-sqlite-do Patch
@effect/sql-sqlite-node Patch
@effect/sql-sqlite-react-native Patch
@effect/sql-sqlite-wasm Patch
@effect/sql Patch
@effect/typeclass Patch
@effect/vitest Patch
@effect/workflow Patch
@effect/ai Patch
@effect/ai-amazon-bedrock Patch
@effect/ai-anthropic Patch
@effect/ai-google Patch
@effect/ai-openai Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@gabedemesa gabedemesa force-pushed the gabedemesa/allow-none-for-log-level-none branch from 886029b to 0c51cbd Compare September 17, 2025 20:45
@gabedemesa gabedemesa marked this pull request as draft September 17, 2025 20:46
@gabedemesa gabedemesa closed this Sep 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Discussion Ongoing to Done in PR Backlog Sep 17, 2025
@gabedemesa gabedemesa reopened this Sep 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Done to Discussion Ongoing in PR Backlog Sep 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Discussion Ongoing
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant