v12: Handmerge main into v12 - 2026-Mar-23

[mathomp4]

Supersedes #182

This is a handmerge of main into feature/sdrabenh/gcm_v12. This mainly gets in some PRs that have recently been in main:

• Verify MERRA2 location; ensure correct WEMIN setting for remapping from MERRA-2 and GEOS-IT #188
• Handle SLURM constraint; add blend script #187
• v11: Update remap test cases baseline #186

Now, the main reason I didn't just push this was because of #188 which fixed the WEMIN bits.

I think this is fine but I want @biljanaorescanin, @weiyuan-jiang and @gmao-rreichle to say "Yes, even v12 needs this" before I merge in.

[gmao-rreichle]

I think this is fine but I want @biljanaorescanin, @weiyuan-jiang and @gmao-rreichle to say "Yes, even v12 needs this" before I merge in.

@mathomp4 : Based on a very quick inspection, the source code changes look ok to me. It would be good for @biljanaorescanin and @weiyuan-jiang to double-check.
I don't know how much effort we want to put into CHANGELOG.md. I think we missed a CHANGELOG.md entry for #188 in the original PR, and it's consequently missing here. If you're ok with it, so am I.

[weiyuan-jiang]

Supersedes #182

This is a handmerge of main into feature/sdrabenh/gcm_v12. This mainly gets in some PRs that have recently been in main:

• Verify MERRA2 location; ensure correct WEMIN setting for remapping from MERRA-2 and GEOS-IT #188
• Handle SLURM constraint; add blend script #187
• v11: Update remap test cases baseline #186

Now, the main reason I didn't just push this was because of #188 which fixed the WEMIN bits.

I think this is fine but I want @biljanaorescanin, @weiyuan-jiang and @gmao-rreichle to say "Yes, even v12 needs thieven v12 needs thiss" before I merge in.

Yes,

Supersedes #182

This is a handmerge of main into feature/sdrabenh/gcm_v12. This mainly gets in some PRs that have recently been in main:

• Verify MERRA2 location; ensure correct WEMIN setting for remapping from MERRA-2 and GEOS-IT #188
• Handle SLURM constraint; add blend script #187
• v11: Update remap test cases baseline #186

Now, the main reason I didn't just push this was because of #188 which fixed the WEMIN bits.

I think this is fine but I want @biljanaorescanin, @weiyuan-jiang and @gmao-rreichle to say "Yes, even v12 needs this" before I merge in.

Yes, we need this fix. But this "bug" will not show up in this remap_package if the users go through the normal process

[mathomp4]

Okay @weiyuan-jiang @gmao-rreichle @biljanaorescanin

Can you look at this again. We merged in #179 and #181 into v12, and then I updated this branch here with those changes. It should be the same changes as before, but I want to be sure it looks good to your eyes.

[biljanaorescanin]

Looks good to me as well.

[gmao-rreichle]

Looks ok to me. Thanks!